• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Effects of United States presidents' leadership roles on global security: A case of Carter and Bush.
【24h】

Effects of United States presidents' leadership roles on global security: A case of Carter and Bush.

机译：美国总统的领导角色对全球安全的影响：以卡特和布什为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This qualitative historical case study explored how a U.S. President's leadership impacts on global security. Presidents G. W. Bush and Jimmy Carter were chosen to underscore the historical characterization and effects of their leadership styles on global security and the fight against international terrorism. A thorough review of the literature pertaining to the major concern---global security and terrorism---revealed that studies such as Braziel's (2000), Carens' (2003), Deng's (2001), Hagel's (2002), Lindsay's (2003a), Obi's (2000), and Pillar's (2001) have attempted to address the possibility that a U.S. president significantly affects global security. Some of the studies emphasized military might, military interventions (Hagel, 2002), peacekeeping (Grytsenko, 2006; Jung, 2006), and human rights, democratization, and international economic globalization (Kuperman, 2004) at the expense of intense investigation on the impact on the safety or security of Americans and American interests at home and abroad (Cannistaro, 1995).;The content analysis approach used in this study on the archival data of security decisions collected revealed that both presidents were concerned about global security. In spite of this common passion, however, the presidents deployed different leadership approaches and/or styles (one transactional and the other transformational) with different effects on global security.;The study analysis, which was done by a triangulation approach, showed that various arms of the presidents' leadership consortia interacted, and were measured using qualitative research tools, including "the Zekoist" iterative triangulation concept (ZIT-c). The conclusion reached was that the two presidents' leadership styles affected global security in different ways. The hope here is that this study will generate more interest in leadership and global security and further enhance leadership roles within the purview of systems thinking. With special reference to international terrorism, seeking to redefine leadership concepts in inclusive terns, this study applied ZIT-c to emphasize strongly on iterations as a factor in limiting probabilities of decision errors of leaders. The study used ZIT-c (a new leadership approach) to provide further validation for an earlier "SLT" (the Synergistic Leadership Theory) offered by Irby, Brown, Duffy, and Trautman (2002).;In view of this study, leadership experts, researchers and scholars are encouraged to provide feedback from continued discourses on ZIT-c: an evaluation process, which will further enhance the goal to strengthen global security and reduce international terrorism by redefining the concept of leadership in truly inclusive terms and to reflect today's workplace diversity in our contemporary world, made more urgent and pressing by rapidly expanding globalization.;At the same time, some other studies (Stender, 1998) contended that exploring the leadership roles and styles of past presidents and the presidents' approaches to immigration and security policies would help reveal and add more to the existing knowledge in the area of global security (Hunt, 2002; R. Johnson & Zenko, 2002/2003).;This study has benefited immensely from the comments and reviews of many in addition to those of the school research committee. Professor Mark Ajuogu, President/Director of MacGad Global Research Network Services (MGRS) in Washington State, for instance, strongly believes that the goal of the new leadership approach introduced in "SLT" and "ZIT-c" deserves the scholarly feedback being solicited.
机译：这项定性的历史案例研究探讨了美国总统的领导对全球安全的影响。选择布什总统和吉米·卡特总统强调其领导风格的历史特征及其对全球安全和打击国际恐怖主义的影响。对与全球安全和恐怖主义等主要问题有关的文献进行的全面回顾显示，诸如巴西（2000），卡伦斯（2003），邓（2001），黑格尔（2002），林赛（2003a） ），欧比（Obi（2000）和皮拉（2001）试图解决美国总统严重影响全球安全的可能性。一些研究强调了军事力量，军事干预（黑格尔，2002年），维持和平（格里琴科，2006年；荣格，2006年）以及人权，民主化和国际经济全球化（库珀曼，2004年），却以对这一问题的深入调查为代价。对美国人的安全或保障以及国内外利益的影响（Cannistaro，1995）。本研究对收集的安全决策档案数据使用的内容分析方法表明，两位总统都关心全球安全。然而尽管有这种共同的热情，但总统还是采用了不同的领导方式和/或方式（一种交易方式和另一种变革方式），对全球安全产生了不同的影响。通过三角剖分方法进行的研究分析表明，总统领导联盟的各个部门进行了互动，并使用定性研究工具进行了测量，包括“ Zekoist”迭代三角剖分概念（ZIT-c）。得出的结论是，两位总统的领导风格以不同方式影响了全球安全。这里的希望是，这项研究将引起人们对领导力和全球安全的更多兴趣，并进一步增强系统思维范围内的领导作用。这项研究特别针对国际恐怖主义，试图重新定义包容性任职中的领导概念，因此应用ZIT-c强调强调将迭代作为限制领导者决策错误概率的因素。该研究使用ZIT-c（一种新的领导方法）为Irby，Brown，Duffy和Trautman（2002年）提供的更早的“ SLT”（协同领导理论）提供了进一步的验证。鼓励专家，研究人员和学者从持续的ZIT-c讨论中提供反馈意见：评估过程，该过程将通过以真正具有包容性的方式重新定义领导力概念并反映当今的挑战，从而进一步加强实现全球安全和减少国际恐怖主义的目标。随着全球化的迅速发展，当代世界的工作场所多样性变得更加紧迫和紧迫。同时，其他一些研究（Stender，1998年）认为，探索前任总统的领导角色和风格以及总统对移民和移民的态度安全策略将有助于揭示和增加全球安全领域的现有知识（Hunt，2002； R。Johnson＆Zenko，2002/2003）。除了学校研究委员会的许多评论和评论外，还有很多其他评论和评论。例如，位于华盛顿州的MacGad全球研究网络服务（MGRS）总裁/董事Mark Ajuogu教授坚信，“ SLT”和“ ZIT-c”中引入的新领导方法的目标值得征求学者的反馈。 。

著录项

  • 作者

    Orji, Hezekiah Uba.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Phoenix.;

  • 授予单位 University of Phoenix.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.;Political Science General.;Sociology General.
  • 学位 D.M.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 240 p.
  • 总页数 240
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号