首页> 外文学位 >Noetic apologetics: A contemporary approach in comparison to historical apologetic methods.
【24h】

Noetic apologetics: A contemporary approach in comparison to historical apologetic methods.

机译:Noetic辩证法:与历史辩证法相比的当代方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many are intrigued by the fundamental questions of life. Questions of origin, moral, and purpose are just a few of these. Christians have endeavored throughout the centuries in the task of apologetics to give sound answers to these questions. The history of Christianity has shown that apologists answered objections and inquires about their religion. Many techniques have emerged to direct apologists in explaining their faith. However, there seems to be no unifying process for doing apologetics. This study examines the different apologetic methods and exposes their strong and weak points in order to develop a more efficient strategy. The research method for this dissertation is a qualitative grounded theory. The goal of this study is to evaluate the historical profile of past apologetic methods in order to provide knowledge, direction, and guidance for doing a more effective apologetic in the 21st century.
机译:许多生活基本问题引起了人们的兴趣。起源,道德和目的问题只是其中的几个。几个世纪以来,基督徒一直在致力于辩护的任务中为这些问题提供正确的答案。基督教的历史表明,辩护律师回答了异议并询问了他们的宗教信仰。已经出现了许多技术来指导辩护律师解释其信仰。但是,似乎没有统一的过程进行辩护。这项研究探讨了不同的道歉方法,并揭示了它们的长处和短处,以便制定更有效的策略。本文的研究方法是定性的扎根理论。这项研究的目的是评估过去的辩护方法的历史概况,以便为在21世纪进行更有效的辩护提供知识,方向和指导。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hernandez, Enuel.;

  • 作者单位

    Liberty University.;

  • 授予单位 Liberty University.;
  • 学科 Religion General.;Religion History of.;Theology.
  • 学位 D.Min.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 128 p.
  • 总页数 128
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号