• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Psychology and Human Flourishing: Gaining Knowledge for Psychology Through both Philosophy and Science.
【24h】

Psychology and Human Flourishing: Gaining Knowledge for Psychology Through both Philosophy and Science.

机译：心理学与人类蓬勃发展：通过哲学和科学获得心理学知识。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Clinical psychologists are guided in their work by their comprehensive worldview, including beliefs about the nature and authority of knowledge claims, about the nature and constitution of human persons, and about ethical and moral claims. They will invariably apply their philosophies to clinical work with clients, though not always with consistency. Some hold certain views of reality yet practice as if these views are untrue.;There are currently 3 reductionist viewpoints, both dominant in Western academia and universities, and dehumanizing in their implications. They are: strict empiricism in epistemology, reductive materialism (or physicalism) in metaphysics, and relativism in ethics. Though these are theoretical concepts, the practical application of them (conscious or unconscious) has deep and profound consequences for clinical psychology, daily life, and human destiny (individual or corporate).;Each of these 3 views contains an implicit rejection of holistic and teleological conceptions of human life (Russell, 1971, p. 31). Empiricism, physicalism, and relativism all contribute to a piecemeal, fragmented, disintegrated, and abridged overall view of knowledge and the nature of reality, of human persons, and of ethics.;Many thinkers maintain that a realistic, rational, critically based, evidentially sound, and frankly more accurate view of the nature of the world and of human beings, will make psychotherapy more effective, and that ignoring these views could make psychotherapy ineffective, or even harmful.;First, knowledge is available apart from narrow empiricism. Second, we live in a world of immaterial essences joined to physical bodies, not merely material bodies. Third, important core elements of morality and ethics are indeed true for everyone, not merely subject to arbitrary, constructivist, social, or individual hermeneutic whims. There is good evidence for these 3 claims and therefore good reason to believe them.;Many clinical implications follow from the acceptance or rejection of these views, including whether human beings can know and act upon knowledge apart from science, whether we have merely instrumental or deeply intrinsic value, whether we have libertarian free will or are wholly determined by the laws of physics and chemistry, and whether the concept of moral (or other) improvement is possible or rendered incoherent by relativism.
机译：临床心理学家的工作以其全面的世界观为指导，其中包括对知识主张的性质和权威，对人的本质和构成以及道德和道德主张的信念。他们将始终如一地将自己的理念运用到与客户的临床工作中，尽管并不总是保持一致。有些人持有某些关于现实的观点，但实践起来好像这些观点是不正确的。；目前有3种还原论观点，在西方学术界和大学中都占主导地位，并且在其含义上具有非人性化。它们是：认识论中的严格经验主义，形而上学中的还原性唯物主义（或物理主义）和伦理学中的相对主义。尽管这些是理论概念，但它们的实际应用（有意识或无意识）对临床心理学，日常生活和人类命运（个人或企业）产生了深远而深远的影响。；这三种观点中的每一种都隐含了对整体性和内在性的拒绝。人类生命的目的论概念（罗素，1971年，第31页）。经验主义，物理主义和相对主义都对知识和现实，人类和伦理的本质的零散，零散，瓦解和精简的整体观点做出了贡献。健全，坦率地说更准确地了解世界和人类的本质，将使心理治疗更加有效，而忽视这些观点会使心理治疗无效或什至有害。首先，除了狭narrow的经验主义之外，知识是可用的。第二，我们生活在一个非物质本质的世界中，它不仅与物质身体相连，而且与身体相连。第三，道德和伦理的重要核心要素确实对每个人都是正确的，而不仅仅是受到任意的，建构主义的，社会的或个人的诠释性的异想天开。这三个主张有充分的证据，因此有充分的理由相信它们。许多临床意义源于对这些观点的接受或拒绝，包括人类是否可以了解科学之外的知识并根据知识行事，我们是否仅是工具性的或有工具的？深层的内在价值，我们是否拥有自由意志主义的自由意志，还是由物理学和化学定律完全决定，以及道德（或其他）改善的概念是否可能或相对论使之变得不连贯。

著录项

  • 作者

    Houchin, Chad A.;

  • 作者单位

    George Fox University.;

  • 授予单位 George Fox University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Psychology Clinical.
  • 学位 Psy.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 124 p.
  • 总页数 124
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号