• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A Kantian Defense of Regulatory Law and Penalty: Consumer Protection in the Canadian Automotive Industry.
【24h】

A Kantian Defense of Regulatory Law and Penalty: Consumer Protection in the Canadian Automotive Industry.

机译：康德对法规和刑罚的辩护：加拿大汽车工业中的消费者保护。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation asks "How can we justify and set reasonable limits to the government regulation of consumer contracts for goods and services?" Compared to the vast amount of literature on morally defending criminal law and punishment, there is relatively little approaching morally defending regulatory legislation and penalty. However, it will be maintained in this thesis that a) there is no morally significant reason for demarcating between criminal laws and punishment, and regulatory legislation and penalty, b) that similar moral qualification and limits must be applied to the creation of regulatory laws and the imposition of penalties because regulatory legislation is often just as freedom-limiting and its penalties as punitive and, c) that Kantian principles of Justice and Respect establish the groundwork for a moral justification of regulatory legislation and penalty in the same way as they do for criminal law and punishment. After rejecting the most common moral distinctions asserted between criminal law and regulatory law, this dissertation will offer an alternative based on the method most efficacious for enforcing the Principle of Justice in particular contexts. The regulatory focus is on consumer contracts, a necessary feature of juridical society and that which best illustrates Kant's principles. The automotive industry is used as an example as it is the largest industry in Ontario, and follows some of the most comprehensive consumer protection laws in the province.;Part One of the thesis establishes the moral basis for legislation including a normative ground for the imposition of penalty. Part Two focuses on applying Kantian principles to regulating consumer contracts and to sentencing principles in relation to penalty.;Limiting regulatory legislation and identifying appropriate penalties is not the primary focus of this dissertation, but to develop a foundation for further discussion on the serious matter of recognizing that establishing a normative basis for regulatory legislation, and the imposition of proscriptions and penalties under it, is as important to the regulatory system as it is to the criminal system.
机译：本论文提出“如何为政府对商品和服务的消费者合同的监管规定合理的理由并设定合理的限制？”与关于道德捍卫刑法和刑罚的大量文献相比，在道德维护法律法规和刑罚方面的研究相对较少。但是，本论文将坚持以下观点：a）在刑法与刑罚，监管立法与刑罚之间没有道德上显着的理由进行区分，b）在制定监管法律时必须应用类似的道德条件和限制，以及之所以采取处罚措施，是因为监管立法通常是对自由的限制，而其处罚也属于惩罚性措施； c）康德的公正与尊重原则为监管立法和惩罚的道德辩护奠定了基础，就像它们对执法和制裁的道理一样。刑法和刑罚。在驳斥了刑法与规制法之间最常见的道德区别之后，本论文将基于在特定情况下最有效地执行正义原则的方法提供另一种选择。监管的重点是消费者合同，这是法治社会的必要特征，并且最能说明康德的原则。以汽车行业为例，因为它是安大略省最大的行业，并且遵循了该省一些最全面的消费者保护法。论文的第一部分建立了立法的道德基础，包括施加强制性的规范依据的罚款。第二部分着重于运用康德原则来规范消费者合同以及与刑罚相关的量刑原则。限制监管立法和确定适当的刑罚不是本论文的主要重点，而是为进一步讨论法律的严重性奠定基础。认识到为监管立法建立规范基础以及对其施加禁令和处罚对监管系统和对刑事系统一样重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Roberts, Debbie Lee.;

  • 作者单位

    York University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 York University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Commerce-Business.;Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 344 p.
  • 总页数 344
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号