首页> 外文学位 >Incompatibility without contradiction: The parallax relation of Jacques Ranciere and Pierre Bourdieu.
【24h】

Incompatibility without contradiction: The parallax relation of Jacques Ranciere and Pierre Bourdieu.

机译:不矛盾而不矛盾:雅克·兰西埃(Jacques Ranciere)和皮埃尔·布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)的视差关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The opposed approaches that are found in the political thought of Jacques Ranciere and the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, it is argued, are contradictory, but not incompatible. In conceiving the relation between the two thinkers as a parallax, this thesis argues that because the political is itself a contested or objectively incomplete phenomenon, that no single perspective is capable of filling out a complete conception of it.;Keywords: Ranciere, Bourdieu, Political Theory, Aesthetics, Sociology, Field, Habitus;The work of Ranciere and Bourdieu is incompatible because the condition of possibility for analyzing social and political phenomena from one disposition precludes any acknowledgement of the other. The source of this near complete theoretical divergence, yet also the source of their more fundamental lack of contradiction, the thesis argues, is two radically different notions of contingency that each theorist uses to explain the emergence of social and political order (arkhe). For Ranciere, contingency operates as a logical conception, while for Bourdieu it functions as a component of complexity. The thesis uses the opposed notions of contingency to account for the difficulty of translating between these two disparate theoretical discourses. Instead of offering a comparison and contrast, the thesis argues that the necessary limit-point of each theory is reached and marked out as it runs up against the other. On this basis, the thesis proposes a way to re-read both Bourdieu and Ranciere in light of one another's work.
机译:有人认为,雅克·兰西埃(Jacques Ranciere)的政治思想与皮埃尔·布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)的社会学研究中发现的对立方法是相互矛盾的,但并非矛盾。在将两个思想家之间的关系视作视差时,本论文认为,由于政治本身是一种有争议的或客观上不完整的现象,因此,没有一个单一的观点能够填补其完整的概念。关键字:Ranciere,Bourdieu,政治理论,美学,社会学,田野,习惯; Ranciere和Bourdieu的工作是不相容的,因为从一种倾向分析社会和政治现象的可能性条件排除了对另一种倾向的认可。论文认为,这种近乎完全的理论分歧的根源,也是其更为根本的缺乏矛盾的根源,是每个理论家用来解释社会和政治秩序的出现的两种根本不同的权变概念(arkhe)。对于兰西埃(Ranciere),权变是逻辑概念,而对布迪厄(Bourdieu),权变则是复杂性的组成部分。本文使用权变的对立概念来解释在这两种不同的理论话语之间进行翻译的困难。论文没有提供比较和对比,而是认为每种理论都达到了必要的极限点,并在与另一种理论相抵触时被标出。在此基础上,本文提出了一种根据彼此的作品重新阅读布迪厄和兰西尔的方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hamilton, Matthew James.;

  • 作者单位

    Trent University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Trent University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Sociology Theory and Methods.;Political Science General.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 249 p.
  • 总页数 249
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号