• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >*Canada, the United States and the command and control of air forces for continental air defence from Ogdensburg to NORAD, 1940-1957.
【24h】

*Canada, the United States and the command and control of air forces for continental air defence from Ogdensburg to NORAD, 1940-1957.

机译：* 1940-1957年，加拿大，美国和从奥格登斯堡到NORAD的大陆防空空军的指挥与控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation examines the evolution of the bilateral Canadian-American continental air defence operational-level command and control relationship from the 1940 Ogdensburg Agreement to the establishment of the North American Air Defence Command (NORAD) in 1957. It takes a functional approach, focusing on the efforts of Canadian air force officers in conjunction with their American counterparts to develop efficient command and control arrangements to ensure effective air defence of North America while at the same time safeguarding Canadian sovereignty. It explores the evolution of certain command and control principles such as cooperation, unity of command, operational command, and operational control, and argues that because Canada was able to avoid having its air defence forces come under American command, Canadian sovereignty was assured. It also demonstrates that the Canada-U.S. bilateral continental air defence command and control relationship had its origins in Canadian, American, and British joint command and control culture and practice. Canadian steadfastness, along with compromise and accommodation between the two North American nations, operational and doctrinal factors, and also cordial professional working relationships and personalities, all played important roles in the evolution of this command and control relationship from the "cooperation-unity of command" paradigm of the Second World War towards "operational control" in an air defence context throughout the early Cold War. This paradigm shift culminated in 1957 with the integration and centralization of combined air defences under an overall NORAD commander exercising operational control. The thesis also demonstrates that by taking an active role in Canada-U.S. command and control arrangements, Canada was able to avoid a negative "defence against help" situation with the United States and ensure that it secured a proverbial "piece of the action" in the bilateral North American continental air defence mission. Moreover, through this active functional approach, Canadian officers were able to safeguard Canadian sovereignty and at the same time perform an effective and important operational role in the combined efforts with the United States to defend the continent from aerial attack. This dissertation therefore makes an important contribution to the study of command and control and the history of North American continental defence.
机译：本文研究了从1940年的《奥格登斯堡协定》到1957年成立北美防空司令部（NORAD）的加美-加洲双边防空行动级指挥与控制关系的演变。它采取了一种功能性方法，重点是加拿大空军军官与美国同行一起努力制定有效的指挥和控制安排，以确保北美的有效防空，同时维护加拿大的主权。它探讨了某些指挥和控制原则的演变，例如合作，指挥统一，作战指挥和作战控制，并认为由于加拿大能够避免将其防空部队置于美国的指挥之下，因此可以确保加拿大的主权。它还表明，加拿大-美国双边大陆防空指挥与控制关系起源于加拿大，美国和英国的联合指挥与控制文化和实践。加拿大的坚定不移，以及两个北美国家之间的妥协和适应，业务和理论因素，以及亲切的专业工作关系和个性，都在这种由“合作统一”的指挥与控制关系的演变中发挥了重要作用。在整个冷战初期的防空环境中，第二次世界大战向“作战控制”迈进的范式。这种范式转变在1957年达到最高峰，在执行作战控制的总NORAD指挥官的领导下，联合防空系统得以整合和集中化。论文还表明，通过在加美指挥与控制安排中发挥积极作用，加拿大能够避免与美国之间出现负面的“抗援辩护”局面，并确保加拿大获得了众所周知的“行动的一部分”。北美双边防空任务。此外，通过这种积极的职能方法，加拿大军官能够捍卫加拿大的主权，同时在与美国共同保护该大陆免遭空中袭击的共同努力中发挥有效和重要的业务作用。因此，本论文为指挥与控制研究以及北美大陆防御的历史做出了重要贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Goette, Richard Evan.;

  • 作者单位

    Queen's University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Queen's University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Military history.;American history.;Canadian history.;American studies.;Economic history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 395 p.
  • 总页数 395
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号