首页> 外文学位 >Performance evaluation of duct-mounted relative humidity sensors used in building HVAC applications.
【24h】

Performance evaluation of duct-mounted relative humidity sensors used in building HVAC applications.

机译:建筑物HVAC应用中使用管道安装的相对湿度传感器的性能评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Relative humidity sensors are common components in building heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, and their performance can significantly impact energy use in these systems. A study was undertaken to test and evaluate the most commonly used relative humidity sensors in building HVAC systems, namely the capacitive and resistive types. Sensor models from six different manufacturers were used for testing. Three sensors of each model for a total of 18 sensors were tested, nine of them were capacitive-type sensors and nine were resistive-type sensors. The performance of these sensors was determined by subjecting the sensors to a series of tests that included accuracy, linearity, repeatability, hysteresis, ageing, response time and stress. For each test, a detailed method of test was developed and peer reviewed.; The accuracy test results showed that two of the six humidity sensor models were within manufacturer specified accuracy, while a third sensor model did not met the manufactured specified accuracy at any humidity level tested, and finally, the remaining three sensor models, met the manufacturer specified accuracy for only part of the humidity range. Further, the repeatability of all sensors models at 50% RH and 15, 25, and 35°C was within 1.5% RH. The maximum hysteresis for all sensors was less than 3.2% for all humidities and temperatures. And finally, at 25°C, Model-B sensor had the largest nonlinearity of -3.8% while Model-C sensor had the least nonlinearity of 0.0%.; The accuracy results after the ageing test showed that only one sensor out of twelve sensors was unaffected both before and after the ageing test, while four sensors out of the remaining eleven sensors were unaffected after the ageing test.; The response time test results showed that the average response times of relative humidity sensors ranged between 7 sec and 96 sec.; The accuracy test results after the stress test showed that two out of six sensors remain unaffected at all relative humidities, while two out of the remaining four sensor models were affected at any relative humidities evaluated. The remaining two sensor models failed after the stress test.
机译:相对湿度传感器是建筑物采暖,通风和空调(HVAC)系统中的常见组件,其性能会严重影响这些系统中的能源使用。进行了一项研究,以测试和评估建筑物HVAC系统中最常用的相对湿度传感器,即电容式和电阻式。测试使用了来自六个不同制造商的传感器模型。每个型号测试了三个传感器,总共测试了18个传感器,其中9个是电容型传感器,另外9个是电阻型传感器。这些传感器的性能是通过对传感器进行一系列测试来确定的,这些测试包括准确性,线性,可重复性,磁滞,老化,响应时间和压力。对于每个测试,都开发了详细的测试方法并进行了同行评审。准确性测试结果表明,六个湿度传感器型号中有两个在制造商指定的精度范围内,而第三个传感器型号在任何湿度水平下均未达到制造商指定的精度,最后,其余三个传感器型号均达到制造商指定的精度仅在部分湿度范围内的精度。此外,所有传感器型号在50%RH和15、25和35°C下的重复性都在1.5%RH之内。对于所有湿度和温度,所有传感器的最大磁滞均小于3.2%。最后,在25°C下,Model-B传感器的最大非线性度为-3.8%,而Model-C传感器的最小非线性度为0.0%。老化测试后的准确性结果表明,在老化测试前后,十二个传感器中只有一个传感器不受影响,而其余的十一个传感器中的四个传感器在老化测试后均不受影响。响应时间测试结果表明,相对湿度传感器的平均响应时间在7秒至96秒之间。压力测试后的准确性测试结果表明,六分之二的传感器在所有相对湿度下均不受影响,而其余四分之二的传感器模型在评估的任何相对湿度下均受影响。压力测试后,其余两个传感器模型均失败。

著录项

  • 作者

    Joshi, Shailesh Narayan.;

  • 作者单位

    Iowa State University.;

  • 授予单位 Iowa State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.; Engineering Mechanical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 174 p.
  • 总页数 174
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;机械、仪表工业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号