• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Internationalism and Global Governance in Canadian Public Law.
【24h】

Internationalism and Global Governance in Canadian Public Law.

机译：加拿大公法中的国际主义和全球治理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Globalization presents domestic lawmakers with a dilemma. Because of internationalist moral commitments, they may be inclined to use domestic law to protect the rights or interests of people beyond their borders. But globalization also challenges conventional assumptions about the primacy of state law. The increasing global interconnectedness of economic, social, and cultural life raises doubts about the governance capacity of state institutions. And new forms of global governance, based on international organizations and global networks, have become more prominent.;In the last few decades, Canadian lawmakers have enacted a number of statutes and regulations that appear to mobilize domestic law for the pursuit of internationalist values. These include the Official Development Assistance Accountability Act (2008), legislation providing for the environmental assessment of projects outside Canada, and Canada's Access to Medicines Regime (2004). In this dissertation, I apply post-realist analytic techniques to these legal texts and to the legislative debates surrounding them. These techniques include the analysis of indeterminacies, distributive and constitutive effects, background rules, and historical contingencies.;I argue that these law reform projects are less Canadian than they might appear. They draw on a wide variety of discourses, policy models, and norms imported from other countries, from international organizations, and from expert networks. Rather than reflections of Canadians' moral and political choices, these legislative regimes appear as nodes in larger configurations of global governance.;I also examine the specific legal and institutional techniques used by Canadian lawmakers to deal with claims of global justice. A number of themes appear in multiple case studies. These include the use of a paired set of arguments about non-discrimination and sovereignty; reliance on procedures; deference to expertise, and the invocation of a public/private distinction. On the whole, Canadian internationalist legislation in the post-Cold War era reflects the influence of neoliberalism.
机译：全球化给国内立法者带来了困境。由于国际主义的道德承诺，他们可能倾向于使用国内法来保护其境外人民的权利或利益。但是全球化也挑战了关于州法至上的传统假设。经济，社会和文化生活的全球联系日益紧密，这使人们对国家机构的治理能力产生怀疑。在国际组织和全球网络的基础上，新的全球治理形式变得更加突出。；在过去的几十年中，加拿大立法者制定了许多法规和法规，似乎动员了国内法追求国际主义价值观。其中包括《官方发展援助问责法》（2008年），对加拿大境外项目进行环境评估的立法以及加拿大的《药品获取制度》（2004年）。在本文中，我将后现实主义的分析技术应用于这些法律文本以及围绕它们的立法辩论。这些技术包括对不确定性，分配和本构效应，背景规则和历史偶然性的分析。；我认为这些法律改革项目的加拿大性不如预期。它们借鉴了从其他国家，国际组织和专家网络中引入的各种话语，政策模型和规范。这些立法制度没有反映加拿大人的道德和政治选择，而是在更大范围的全球治理中作为节点出现。我还研究了加拿大立法者用来处理全球正义主张的特定法律和制度技术。在多个案例研究中出现了许多主题。这些措施包括使用关于非歧视和主权的成对论据；依赖程序；尊重专业知识，并援引公共/私人的区别。总体而言，冷战后时代的加拿大国际主义立法反映了新自由主义的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    McKee, Derek Daniel.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.;International law.;Canadian studies.
  • 学位 S.J.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 331 p.
  • 总页数 331
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号