首页> 外文学位 >Gardening with Gramsci? Analysing edible gardens as a sustainable Agrifood Initiative.
【24h】

Gardening with Gramsci? Analysing edible gardens as a sustainable Agrifood Initiative.

机译:用葛兰西园艺吗?将食用花园分析为可持续农业食品计划。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Agrifood Initiatives, such as edible gardens, farmers' markets, and Community Supported Agriculture (CSA), represent a response to the dominant commodity food system. Focusing on small-scale food system participants in general and gardeners in particular this thesis seeks to understand the performance of AFIs as it is connected to the operation of the commodity food system. To this end, interviews with local gardeners were carried out. These interviews are used to assess the potential of gardens to help change the food system. This thesis employs Antonio Gramsci's concept of cultural and counter-hegemony and the concept of scale to analyse the commodity food system, Agrifood Initiatives in general, and edible gardens in particular. Combined with the literature, the interview-results are used to explore whether edible gardens have counter-hegemonic potential and hence are able to further food system change and how their performance could be improved. This thesis demonstrates that the interviewee's understanding of the terms `functional' and `alternative' confirms the literature-based definition of these terms, as well as that edible gardens as AFIs possess certain counter-hegemonic potential. In addition this thesis suggests how their counter-hegemonic performance could be improved. The integration of the concept of scales into the theoretical framework to understand and resolve the question of how the efficiency of hegemony is linked to scale, the extension of Johnston's (2007) list of counter-hegemonic criteria, as well as the application and extension of the Gramscian approach into the field of food studies represent the contribution to the literature this thesis makes.
机译:食用花园,农民市场和社区支持农业(CSA)等农业食品倡议是对主要商品食品体系的回应。本文着重于一般的小规模食品系统参与者,尤其是园丁,本论文旨在了解AFI与商品食品系统运行相关的性能。为此,对当地园丁进行了采访。这些访谈被用来评估花园改变食物系统的潜力。本文采用安东尼奥·葛兰西的文化和反霸权的概念以及规模的概念来分析商品粮食系统,一般来说的农业粮食计划,尤其是食用花园。结合文献资料,访谈结果用于探讨可食用花园是否具有反霸权的潜力,从而能够进一步改变食品体系以及如何改善其性能。本文证明,受访者对“功能性”和“替代性”术语的理解证实了这些术语的文献定义,以及作为AFI的可食用花园具有一定的反霸权潜力。此外,本论文还提出了如何改善其反霸权表现。将天平的概念整合到理论框架中,以理解和解决霸权效率如何与天平相关联,约翰斯顿(2007)反霸权标准清单的扩展以及食品研究领域的葛兰西方法代表了对本论文所做的文献的贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Holzapfel, Nicole.;

  • 作者单位

    Wilfrid Laurier University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Wilfrid Laurier University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Geography.;Economics Agricultural.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 123 p.
  • 总页数 123
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号