• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Bioregional politics: Social learning and public participation in Great Lakes water quality policy in Detroit and Toronto (1972--2001) (Michigan, Ontario).
【24h】

Bioregional politics: Social learning and public participation in Great Lakes water quality policy in Detroit and Toronto (1972--2001) (Michigan, Ontario).

机译：生物区域政治：底特律和多伦多的大湖水质政策的社会学习和公众参与（1972--2001年）（安大略省密歇根州）。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The primal character of water and the age old concern with collective action problems frames the focus of the research effort, with an exploratory approach that contributes to the debates concerning the workings of the public policy process (including implementation), the parameters of environmental policy within the context of watershed politics, and the role of actors and institutions in the resolution of collective action problems regarding common pool resources in one key area of water "abundance," the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence Ecosystem. I analyze the policy design of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA), explore the philosophic roots of modern policy debates and controversies surrounding the democratic resolution of common pool resources, and explore the newsprint coverage in six newspapers (three each from Canada and the US) of each revision of the GLWQA to demonstrate that the agreement is textual evidence of bi-national social learning at multiple levels of governance. Finally, I perform a content analysis of specific terms and phrases appearing in local Detroit and Toronto newsprint between 1985--2001 to develop an argument regarding the difference in a capacity for social learning in each bioregion. The research finds that while in Toronto there is evidence of a well-developed discourse of watershed politics, a slow but steady growth in such a discourse is apparent in Detroit. Implementation of the ecosystem approach and the application of a democratic process in each bioregion is unique yet linked to the degree to which such a discourse is developed or not. The GLWQA therefore finds a friendlier environment in Toronto than in Detroit. Nonetheless, Detroit has been able to move forward outside the formal frameworks of the GLWQA and the remedial action plan process and limp slowly towards an ecological paradigm of sorts. The study thus finds two models of sustainability and sustainable development at the bioregional and urban level of governance. In addition, I argue that a successful confrontation with the agreement includes the development of a discourse of watershed politics and a capacity to engage in social learning at multiple levels of governance and geographic scale.
机译：水的原始特征和人们对集体行动问题的关注已成为研究工作的重点，探索性方法有助于就公共政策流程（包括实施）的运作，内部环境政策的参数进行辩论。分水岭政治的背景，以及参与者和机构在解决集体行动问题方面的作用，这些问题涉及水“丰盛”的一个重要领域，即大湖-圣劳伦斯生态系统中的共同池资源。我分析了《大湖区水质协定》（GLWQA）的政策设计，探讨了围绕民主解决共同池资源问题的现代政策辩论和争议的哲学根源，并探讨了六家报纸（三本分别来自加拿大和加拿大）的新闻纸报道GLWQA的每个修订版，以证明该协议是在多个治理级别上的两国社会学习的文本证据。最后，我对1985--2001年在底特律和多伦多当地新闻纸中出现的特定术语和短语进行了内容分析，以提出关于每个生物区域社交学习能力差异的论点。研究发现，尽管在多伦多有证据表明分水岭政治的话语发展良好，但在底特律，这种话语却缓慢而稳定地增长。生态系统方法的实施和每个生物区域中民主进程的应用是独特的，但与这种论述的发展与否有关。因此，GLWQA在多伦多比底特律找到了更友好的环境。尽管如此，底特律已经能够在GLWQA的正式框架和补救行动计划流程之外前进，并缓慢地向某种生态范式过渡。因此，该研究在生物区域和城市治理层面找到了两种可持续性和可持续发展模式。此外，我认为，与该协议的成功对峙包括发展分水岭政治话语，以及在多层次的治理和地理范围内参与社会学习的能力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Farrah, Jeffrey S.;

  • 作者单位

    Wayne State University.;

  • 授予单位 Wayne State University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Urban and Regional Planning.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 284 p.
  • 总页数 284
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;区域规划、城乡规划;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号