• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Social epistemology: From Keith Lehrer to Alvin I. Goldman (Chinese text).
【24h】

Social epistemology: From Keith Lehrer to Alvin I. Goldman (Chinese text).

机译：社会认识论：从基思·勒勒到阿尔文·高盛（中文）。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Unlike traditional epistemology, which concerns itself mainly with the conditions of knowledge and justification with respect to the information possessed by an individual, social epistemology analyses the conditions of knowledge and justification with respect to the body of information possessed by society members as a whole. In the study of social epistemology, Keith Lehrer's Consensualism and Alvin Goldman's Veritism are by far the two most well-established theories. The two theories are drastically different in their accounts of the conditions of knowledge and justification. Censensualism emphasizes the interaction between members of society and argues for an account of justification on the basis of the notion of weighted consensus. According to Veritism, whether a belief is justified depends on how fecund the relevant belief-forming practice is in producing true beliefs.; This thesis aims to contribute towards a better understanding of social epistemology through a critical examination of the views of Lehrer and Goldman. Chapter One provides a characterization of the fundamental questions in social epistemology. It also sheds light on a number of problem areas through a survey of some major approaches in the field. Chapters Two to Five seek to provide a critical and thorough examination of Consensualism and Veritism: the two theories are explained, scrutinized, and compared, and their major difficulties identified. Ways to deal with such difficulties are also suggested and then evaluated. It is concluded that Lehrer's account tends to over-emphasize epistemic duties that society imposes on an individual while Goldman ignores them unduly. Chapter Six is a constructive attempt to synthesize Consensualism and Veritism. The result of such a synthesis, Noninterventionism, as I hope to show, is a theoretical framework that, if properly elaborated, will preserve the strengths of both theories while avoiding their difficulties.
机译：与传统认识论不同，传统认识论主要关注与个人拥有的信息有关的知识和正当性条件，而社会认识论则分析与整个社会成员所拥有的信息主体有关的知识和正当性条件。在社会认识论的研究中，基思·莱勒的共识主义和阿尔文·戈德曼的《真理论》是迄今为止最完善的两个理论。两种理论在知识条件和辩护条件方面的描述完全不同。经验主义强调社会成员之间的互动，并主张在加权共识概念的基础上解释理由。 Veritism认为，一个信念是否合理取决于相关的信念形成实践在产生真实信念方面的能力。本论文旨在通过对莱勒和高盛的观点进行批判性研究，以更好地理解社会认识论。第一章对社会认识论中的基本问题进行了描述。通过对该领域一些主要方法的调查，它也揭示了许多问题领域。第二章至第五章试图对共识主义和真实主义进行批判和彻底的考察：对这两种理论进行了解释，审查和比较，并查明了它们的主要困难。还提出了解决此类困难的方法，然后进行了评估。结论是，勒勒的说法倾向于过分强调社会对个人施加的认知责任，而高盛则不恰当地忽略了它们。第六章是建设性的尝试，将共识主义与真实主义相结合。我希望证明，这种综合的结果是不干预主义，这是一个理论框架，如果加以适当阐述，它将在避免其困难的同时保留两种理论的优势。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kou, Kei-chun.;

  • 作者单位

    The Chinese University of Hong Kong (People's Republic of China).;

  • 授予单位 The Chinese University of Hong Kong (People's Republic of China).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 188 p.
  • 总页数 188
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号