首页> 外文学位 >Elizabethan formal verse satire and the ideology of dramatic form, 1599--1608 (Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare, John Marston).
【24h】

Elizabethan formal verse satire and the ideology of dramatic form, 1599--1608 (Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare, John Marston).

机译:伊丽莎白女王正式的讽刺讽刺诗和戏剧形式的意识形态,1599--1608年(本·琼森,威廉·莎士比亚,约翰·马斯顿)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This project examines the appropriation of Elizabethan formal verse satire---a reactionary, venomous form of attack that was censored in June 1599---in British drama around the turn of the seventeenth century. Although the playwrights generally ridicule the stylistic and philosophical tendencies of the genre, they also employ it as part of a larger generic and cultural strategy to further their social advancement and to condemn the erosion of conventional mores. Two distinct phases can be identified in this use of Elizabethan verse satire, the first concerning plays written in the years immediately following the censorship. Through the three comical satires (Every Man out of His Humour, Cynthia's Revels, Poetaster), As You Like It, and What You Will, Ben Jonson, William Shakespeare, and John Marston employ Elizabethan verse satire yet in the end repudiate the genre, displacing it by less controversial forms of satire and by idealized comic endings that generally demonstrate their suitability for advancement within a traditional social structure. Beginning in late 1601, Shakespeare, the Parnassus playwright, and Marston reveal through darker, more tragic plays--- Troilus and Cressida, The Second Part of the Return from Parnassus, The Malcontent , and Timon of Athens---an increased awareness of the pervasive and potentially devastating erosion of feudal ties. At the same time these playwrights continue to satirize verse satire, they increasingly rely on the form to communicate their frustration at what they see as the self-destructive, abandonment of traditional values. Elizabethan formal verse satire thus serves an important function for several dramatists in their satiric, hybrid attempts to advance themselves, to grapple with and resolve social issues, and ultimately to vent a helpless rage.
机译:该项目研究了十七世纪初英国戏剧中对伊丽莎白女王正式诗歌讽刺作品的使用(一种讽刺性的反动攻击形式,于1599年6月进行审查)。尽管编剧通常嘲笑该流派的风格和哲学倾向,但他们也将其用作更大的通用和文化策略的一部分,以促进其社会进步并谴责传统习俗的侵蚀。通过使用伊丽莎白女王的讽刺诗,可以确定两个不同的阶段,第一个阶段是在审查制度之后的几年中创作的戏剧。通过三部讽刺讽刺的讽刺小说(《幽默中的每个人》,《辛西娅的Revels》,《诗人》,《随心所欲》和《随心所欲》),本·琼森,威廉·莎士比亚和约翰·马斯顿采用了伊丽莎白女王的讽刺讽刺诗,但最终却否定了这种类型,通过较少争议的讽刺形式和理想化的喜剧结局来代替它,这些结局通常表明它们适合在传统的社会结构中发展。从1601年下半年开始,莎士比亚,帕尔纳苏斯剧作家和马斯顿通过更黑暗,更悲剧的剧情揭露了特洛伊勒斯和克雷塞达,帕尔纳苏斯归来的第二部分,马尔默斯和雅典的提蒙,从而更加了解封建关系的普遍性和潜在破坏性的侵蚀。同时,这些剧作家继续讽刺诗歌讽刺,他们越来越依靠形式来表达他们对传统价值观的自我毁灭和摒弃的挫败感。因此,伊丽莎白女王正式的讽刺讽刺诗对几位戏剧家进行讽刺性的,混合的尝试以提高自己,解决和解决社会问题并最终发泄无助的愤怒时起着重要的作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sowell, Steven Thomas.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Miami.;

  • 授予单位 University of Miami.;
  • 学科 Theater.; Literature English.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 229 p.
  • 总页数 229
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 公共建筑;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号