• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Relational Approaches to US International Cultural Engagement: Promoting National Good and Mutual Understanding through Cooperative Cultural Exchange.
【24h】

Relational Approaches to US International Cultural Engagement: Promoting National Good and Mutual Understanding through Cooperative Cultural Exchange.

机译：美国国际文化参与的关系方法：通过合作文化交流促进国家的善意和相互了解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Some current approaches to US cultural diplomacy demonstrate a distinct departure from older models: rather than just present the United States' ideas, values, and cultures abroad, they actively seek to build mutual and trust-based relationships through two-way communication with the counterpart countries. Under this new relational approach to international cultural engagement, US institutions positively and productively engage with partnering countries by promoting teamwork, building enduring relations, responding to partners' needs, and involving the public in those countries.;These approaches have recently received increased attention in the field, and several scholars and policymakers consider them the ideal approach to US cultural diplomacy. Yet despite this increased interest and recognition, few studies have examined relational approaches in an in-depth manner. To help fill this gap, this study identifies and analyzes how relational approaches are exhibited in two US international cultural engagement programs, and explores how their practices produce distinctive outcomes and impacts. Further, through investigating how to analyze the current state of relational approaches in US practices, I develop an analytical framework that proved useful in examining two-way exchange in the design, implementation, and assessment of relational international cultural engagement programs. Similarly, I develop a set of indicators to assess and measure the outcomes and impacts of relational approaches.;Specifically, this study conducts an in-depth study of two cases: (1) the Andes Partnership, part of the Andes Exchange: Animating Democracy through Arts and Culture; and (2) Being "We, the People": Afghanistan, America & the Minority Imprint, a project of Museums & Community Collaborations Abroad (MCCA). A mix of qualitative research methods, including collection and analysis of both informative and evaluative documents and in-depth interviews, is used to examine the intentions and agendas of the US organizations for their respective projects, how those intentions and plans actually played out on the ground, the experiences of involved personnel both in the US and the counterpart countries, and how those personnel evaluated the projects.;The findings indicate that the relational approaches represented in these two cases avoid a message-oriented and one-sided approach and instead seek out mutual interest, adopting a &
机译：当前一些美国文化外交方法显示出与旧模式的明显不同：它们不只是在海外展示美国的思想，价值观和文化，而是通过与对方的双向沟通​​，积极寻求建立互信的基础国家。在这种新的国际文化互动关系方法下，美国机构通过促进团队合作，建立持久的关系，响应合作伙伴的需求以及使这些国家的公众参与，与合作伙伴国家进行了积极和富有成效的互动。这个领域，一些学者和政策制定者认为它们是美国文化外交的理想方法。尽管人们的兴趣和认可度不断提高，但很少有研究以深入的方式研究关系方法。为了填补这一空白，本研究确定并分析了在美国的两个国际文化参与计划中如何展示关系方法，并探讨了它们的做法如何产生独特的成果和影响。此外，通过研究如何分析美国实践中关系方法的现状，我建立了一个分析框架，证明该框架可用于检查关系国际文化参与计划的设计，实施和评估中的双向交流。同样，我开发了一套指标来评估和衡量关系方法的结果和影响。具体来说，本研究对以下两种情况进行了深入研究：（1）安第斯山脉伙伴关系，安第斯山脉交流的一部分：动画民主通过文化艺术； （2）作为“我们，人民”：阿富汗，美国和少数族裔的烙印，这是一个与国外博物馆和社区合作组织（MCCA）共同设计的项目。定性研究方法的混合使用，包括对信息性和评估性文件的收集和分析以及深入的采访，用于检查美国组织各自项目的意图和议程，这些意图和计划在项目中的实际效果。方面，在美国和对口国家的相关人员的经验以及这些人员如何评估项目。研究结果表明，在这两种情况下代表的关系方法避免了以信息为导向和单方面的方法，而是寻求出于共同利益，采用＆

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee, Da Hyun.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Public policy.;International relations.;Art education.;Arts management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 357 p.
  • 总页数 357
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号