• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >An environmental controversy: How newspapers framed coverage of the Bush administration's proposal to drill for oil and gas in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
【24h】

An environmental controversy: How newspapers framed coverage of the Bush administration's proposal to drill for oil and gas in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

机译：一个环境争议：报纸如何对布什政府提议在北极国家野生动物保护区进行石油和天然气钻探的提议进行报道。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The goal of this study was to assess how a selection of newspapers framed coverage of the Bush Administration's first-term proposal to institute drilling for oil and natural gas in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). Content analysis was used to systematically examine 214 ANWR-related articles and editorials published between February 2001 and March 2003 in 5 strategically chosen Unites States newspapers. Reliability testing was conducted, resulting in a 61-item recording instrument that covered background information, thematic and episodic frames, consequence frames, sources, drilling perspective and tone.;The results corroborate findings from existing communication literature that criticize the quality of environmental news coverage. Although this study uncovered some promising qualities---the ANWR issue frequently appeared in the first section of newspapers and was presented, overall, without being significantly skewed to a specific pro- or anti-drilling perspective---the framing patterns illustrated overly parsimonious coverage: episodic content dominated thematic coverage; government sources were privileged over all other sources; and a scant number of potential ANWR consequences were discussed. As such, as posited by extant research, it is probable that the media content identified in this study was likely to foster among its users a nebulous, decontextualized understanding of the ANWR issue and, perhaps more importantly, an ethereal representation of how this issue can most effectively be resolved.
机译：这项研究的目的是评估一些报纸如何对布什政府提出的在阿拉斯加北极国家野生动物保护区（ANWR）进行石油和天然气钻井的第一期建议进行报道。内容分析被用来系统地审查2001年2月至2003年3月之间在5家经过战略挑选的美国报纸上发表的214篇与ANWR相关的文章和社论。进行了可靠性测试，结果得到了61个项目的记录工具，涵盖了背景信息，主题和情节框架，结果框架，来源，钻探视角和基调;结果证实了现有传播文学中对环境新闻报道质量的批评。 。尽管这项研究发现了一些有希望的品质-ANWR问题经常出现在报纸的第一部分，并且在总体上没有明显偏向特定的钻探或反钻探角度进行了介绍-但这种框架模式说明了过于简约报道：情景内容主导主题报道；政府资源比其他所有资源都享有特权；并讨论了少量潜在的ANWR后果。因此，根据现有研究的假设，本研究中确定的媒体内容很可能会在其用户中培养对ANWR问题的模糊的，非上下文化的理解，更重要的是，可以清晰地表示出该问题的解决方式最有效地解决。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dudo, Anthony David.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Delaware.;

  • 授予单位 University of Delaware.;
  • 学科 Journalism.;Environmental Sciences.;Mass Communications.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 129 p.
  • 总页数 129
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号