• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A quantitative study of the strength of correlation between the characteristics of institutional and faculty vitality with research productivity of selected allied health faculty at public health science universities within the United States.
【24h】

A quantitative study of the strength of correlation between the characteristics of institutional and faculty vitality with research productivity of selected allied health faculty at public health science universities within the United States.

机译：定量研究机构和教职人员的生命力特征与美国公共卫生科学大学中选定的专职卫生教职人员的研究生产力之间的相关强度的定量研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This descriptive and quantitative study was conducted to explore the degree of relationship between individual and institutional/leadership vitality characteristics and high levels research productivity among allied health faculty. The correlation between specific vitality characteristics identified in this study and the production of three or more refereed journal publication per year is statistically significant and, therefore, useful for predicting high levels of productivity among allied health faculty. Five hundred full-time occupational and physical therapy faculty were surveyed for this study: a random sample from the 45 public health science research universities within the U.S. The instruments used for this study were the Survey of Individual, Institutional, and Leadership Factors Affecting Faculty Productivity (SIILFAFP), the Individual Subjective Vitality Scale (ISVS), and the State Subjective Vitality Scale (SSVS). One hundred forty two faculty members from 43 universities returned their surveys, a return rate of 28.4%. The data analysis demonstrates: (a) A significant relationship between faculty's perception of adequate time to conduct research, teaching, patient care and administrative tasks; protected time to conduct research, teaching, patient care and administrative tasks; esteem among fellow colleagues; having a collegial network; a clearly communicated institutional vision; clearly communicated administrative expectations; and the publication of three or more refereed journal articles per year. (b) A significant difference in individual and institutional/leadership vitality factors identified by faculty publishing three or more refereed journal articles per year and those publishing less than three refereed journal articles per year. (c) That specific individual and institutional/leadership vitality characteristics in association with certain demographic characteristics combine to produce a model that is significant in predicting productivity levels of three or more refereed journal publications per year. (d) That all of the institutional/leadership vitality characteristics within the final model of combined vitality characteristics are more significant in predicting productivity then the individual vitality characteristics within this combined model. Among other recommendations, studies should be undertaken to identify models of vitality characteristics that are uniquely predictive of high levels of research productivity in each discipline or category of faculty within the public health science research university if research productivity is to be enhanced and sustained.
机译：这项描述性和定量研究旨在探讨个人和机构/领导力生命力特征与相关卫生学院高水平研究生产率之间的关系程度。在这项研究中确定的特定生命力特征与每年出版三本或以上经引用的期刊出版物之间的相关性具有统计显着性，因此可用于预测专职卫生学院的高水平生产力。这项研究调查了500名全职职业和物理治疗学系教师：来自美国45所公共卫生科学研究大学的随机样本。该研究使用的工具是影响教师生产力的个人，机构和领导因素调查（SIILFAFP），个人主观生命力量表（ISVS）和州主观生命力量表（SSVS）。来自43所大学的一百二十四名教职员工返回了他们的调查，返回率为28.4％。数据分析表明：（a）教师对足够的时间进行研究，教学，患者护理和行政工作的看法之间存在重大关系；保护时间进行研究，教学，患者护理和管理任务；同事之间的尊重；有一个大学网络；清晰传达的机构愿景；明确传达行政期望；并每年出版三篇或以上被引用的期刊文章。 （b）个人和机构/领导力活力因素的显着差异是，教师每年出版三篇或以上的参考期刊文章，而每年出版少于三篇的参考期刊文章。 （c）将特定的个人和机构/领导力生命力特征与某些人口统计特征结合起来，得出了一个模型，该模型对于预测每年引用的三个或更多期刊的生产率水平非常重要。 （d）组合生命力特征最终模型内的所有机构/领导力生命力特征在预测生产率方面比该组合模型内的个体生命力特征更为重要。在其他建议中，如果要提高和维持研究生产力，则应进行研究以识别出生命力特征模型，这些模型可以唯一预测公共卫生科学研究大学内每个学科或教师类别的研究生产力水平。

著录项

  • 作者

    Joseph, Ricky.;

  • 作者单位

    Capella University.;

  • 授予单位 Capella University.;
  • 学科 Educational administration.;Health Sciences Education.;Higher education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 191 p.
  • 总页数 191
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号