首页> 外文学位 >Sinological-orientalism: The production of the West's post-Mao China.
【24h】

Sinological-orientalism: The production of the West's post-Mao China.

机译:汉学东方主义:西方后毛泽东时代的产物。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This project begins where Edward Said left off in 1978: the migration of orientalism from Europe and philology to the U.S. and social science discourse, and from the Middle to the Far East. Recent decades are marked by the rise of the People's Republic of China to global economic prominence, the 'end' of the Cold War and the globalization of American culture and power. I argue that there is a new, specifically Sinological form of orientalism at work in the world. It marks a shift within orientalism from a logic of an essential difference between East and West (as in Said's analysis, or classic colonial discourse) to one of sameness. The West's 'China' is now seen as haltingly but inevitably becoming-the-same as the West: 'liberal,' 'modern,' 'free.' This new orientalism is rooted as much in popular culture as in academe and policy formation, and is driven by capital's force of general equivalence.; To show this re-constitution of orientalism, I draw on Marxist and post-colonial theory in an inter-disciplinary analysis of several fields. These include Area Studies work on the Mao and 'reform' eras, from the Great Leap Forward famine to the 1989 Tiananmen event and beyond; the reception of new Chinese cinema (1984-); current work on modernity, civil society, and globalization where China serves as paradigmatic example; and U.S. media, fiction, and film, ranging from Jack London to Don DeLillo and Martin Scorsese, that offers an historicist interpretation of China. The emergence of this new orientalism---documented at length for the first time here---has multiple consequences for Cultural, American and Area Studies, and for post-colonial theory. Contra the consensus within China Studies, the Saidian problematic of orientalism is still with us, albeit in a new, more global and 'Americanized' form. But we must return to one of the primary contradictions of colonialism: that in some cases it is mandated that the 'Other' can and must become the same. And we need to engage the intertwined histories of the Cold War and post-colonialism. For this project demonstrates that Cold War discourse is a colonial discourse, and part of the new orientalism.
机译:这个项目从1978年爱德华·赛义德(Edward Said)离开的地方开始:东方主义从欧洲和语言学到美国和社会科学话语的转移,从中东到远东的转移。最近几十年的特点是中华人民共和国在全球经济中的崛起,冷战的“终结”以及美国文化和权力的全球化。我认为,世界上正在出现一种新的,特别是汉学的东方主义形式。它标志着东方主义从东方和西方之间本质上的区别的逻辑(如赛义德的分析,或经典的殖民话语)向同一性转变。现在,西方的“中国”被视为停滞不前,但不可避免地与西方一样:“自由”,“现代”,“自由”。这种新的东方主义根植于流行文化中,就像植根于学术界和政策制定中一样,并且是由资本的普遍对等力量所驱动的。为了展示这种东方主义的重构,我在几个领域的跨学科分析中借鉴了马克思主义和后殖民理论。其中包括从大跃进饥荒到1989年天安门事件及以后的关于毛泽东时代和“改革”时代的地区研究工作;接待新中国电影(1984-);目前在现代性,公民社会和全球化方面的工作,其中中国就是范例;美国的媒体,小说和电影,从杰克·伦敦(Jack London)到唐·德利洛(Don DeLillo)和马丁·斯科塞斯(Martin Scorsese),都提供了对中国的历史主义解释。这种新的东方主义的出现(在此首次进行了详细记录)对文化,美国和地区研究以及后殖民理论具有多重影响。与《中国研究》内部的共识相反,赛义德关于东方主义的问题仍然存在,尽管它以一种新的,更具全球性和“美国化”的形式出现。但是,我们必须回到殖民主义的主要矛盾之一:在某些情况下,“其他”可以而且必须变得相同。我们需要参与冷战和后殖民主义的纠缠历史。因为这个项目表明,冷战话语是殖民话语,并且是新东方主义的一部分。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vukovich, Daniel Frederick.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 American Studies.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.; Cinema.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 286 p.
  • 总页数 286
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界史;电影、电视艺术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号