• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Institutes, scholars, and transnational dynamics: A disciplinary history of International Relations in Germany and France.
【24h】

Institutes, scholars, and transnational dynamics: A disciplinary history of International Relations in Germany and France.

机译：研究所，学者和跨国动态：德国和法国的国际关系学科史。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation aims to analyze the developmental trajectories of the International Relations (IR) discipline by going beyond the usual narratives that focus only on the American (and to a lesser extent the British) IR community. While explaining the role of scholars and institutes in establishing IR as an academic discipline in (West) Germany and France, the impact of transnational dynamics plays an important role. The most important actors that lie at the origins of transnationality are American foundations, the American government and military officials, German and French scholars with US educational backgrounds, refugee-scholars who returned to Europe or stayed in the US (both in the 19 th and 20th centuries), German and French political decision-makers, their academic communities and national university structures, and international scholarly organizations. I show how the combined impact of these forces paved the way for the establishment of a hybrid IR in these two continental European countries.;In order to clarify the conditions that marked IR's different trajectories, I highlight the International Studies Conference (ISC), an interwar international association that brought together scholars who were interested in the study of the international. By covering both the interwar years and providing an analysis of the post-1945 pathways of the discipline in Europe, the dissertation expands the temporal and the geographic scope of IR's disciplinary historiography. I analyze the role of Arnold Bergstraesser and the Deutsche Hochschule fur Politik (DHfP) in the German case, and of Pierre Renouvin and Jean-Baptiste Duroselle, as well as Sciences Po Paris, in the French case because these scholarly and institutional actors made the most important contributions to IR's development in these countries. The dissertation shows how IR is a discipline whose past cannot be explained merely in terms of its American development. Understanding IR's different trajectories in Europe helps to gain a better understanding of its present plurality that is being shaped by a less Western-centric world.
机译：本文的目的是通过超越仅关注美国（以及程度较小的英国）IR社区的通常叙述来分析国际关系（IR）学科的发展轨迹。在解释学者和机构在将IR确立为（西方）德国和法国的学术学科中的作用时，跨国动力的影响起着重要作用。跨国起源的最重要参与者是美国基金会，美国政府和军事官员，具有美国教育背景的德国和法国学者，返回欧洲或留在美国的难民学者（19世纪和19世纪）。 20世纪），德国和法国的政治决策者，他们的学术团体和国家大学结构以及国际学术组织。我将展示这些力量的综合影响如何为在这两个欧洲大陆国家建立混合IR铺平道路。为了澄清标志IR不同轨迹的条件，我着重介绍了国际研究会议（ISC），两次世界大战之间的国际协会，它对国际研究感兴趣。通过涵盖两次战争之间的年代并提供对1945年后欧洲学科发展道路的分析，本论文扩展了IR学科史学的时间和地理范围。我分析了Arnold Bergstraesser和Deutsche Hochschule fur Politik（DHfP）在德国案中的作用，以及Pierre Renouvin和Jean-Baptiste Duroselle以及Sciences Po Paris在法国案中的作用，因为这些学者和机构演员使这些国家对IR发展的最重要贡献。论文表明，关系情报学是一门学科，仅凭其在美国的发展就无法解释其过去。理解IR在欧洲的不同轨迹有助于更好地了解其目前由西方为中心的世界所塑造的多元化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kuru, Deniz.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Southern California.;

  • 授予单位 University of Southern California.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Relations.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 505 p.
  • 总页数 505
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号