首页> 外文学位 >Individual and collective human rights: The contributions of Jacques Maritain, Gustavo Gutierrez, and Martha Nussbaum.
【24h】

Individual and collective human rights: The contributions of Jacques Maritain, Gustavo Gutierrez, and Martha Nussbaum.

机译:个人和集体人权:Jacques Maritain,Gustavo Gutierrez和Martha Nussbaum的贡献。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract The proclamation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations on December 10, 1948 gave birth to the contemporary human rights movement. Despite the worldwide influence the idea of human rights has enjoyed, the concept of human rights has been plagued by a number of criticisms. Among the most pervasive and persistent criticisms of human rights are that they represent an individualist viewpoint, and they are a relative product of Western society that are hardly universal. One purpose of this dissertation is to challenge these criticisms. However, in recent decades the idea of human rights has been expanded past its original individual focus to incorporate the idea of collective, or group rights. The juxtaposition of universal, individual rights with particular, collective rights raises anew the issues of individualism and universalism in the human rights debate. In this dissertation, I compare the work of the French Catholic philosopher Jacques Maritain, the Peruvian theologian Gustavo Gutierrez, and the American philosopher Martha Nussbaum in order to yield a contextually sensitive natural law approach to human rights that will serve as a common justificatory basis for individual and collective human rights. This common justificatory basis is capable of addressing the questions of individualism and universalism generated by the theoretical tensions generated by the juxtaposition of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), which enshrines individual, universal rights, and the more recent United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007), which enshrines more particularistic, group rights.
机译:摘要1948年12月10日,联合国宣布《世界人权宣言》,催生了当代人权运动。尽管人权观念在世界范围内享有影响,但人权观念却受到许多批评的困扰。对人权最普遍和持久的批评之一是,它们代表了个人主义观点,是西方社会相对普遍的产物。本文的目的之一就是挑战这些批评。但是,近几十年来,人权的概念已超出其最初的个人关注点,以纳入集体或团体权利的概念。普遍,个人权利与特别是集体权利的并置,在人权辩论中提出了新的个人主义和普遍主义问题。在这篇论文中,我比较了法国天主教哲学家雅克·马里坦(Jacques Maritain),秘鲁神学家古斯塔沃·古铁雷斯(Gustavo Gutierrez)和美国哲学家玛莎·努斯鲍姆(Martha Nussbaum)的工作,以期对人权采取一种因地制宜的自然法方法,这将为人权的共同辩护奠定基础个人和集体人权。这一共同的论据基础能够解决因《世界人权宣言》(1948年)并置而产生的理论张力所产生的个人主义和普遍主义问题,《世界人权宣言》载有个人,普遍权利以及最近的《联合国人权宣言》。 《土著人民权利》(2007年),其中载有更为特殊的群体权利。

著录项

  • 作者

    May, David Keith.;

  • 作者单位

    The Florida State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Florida State University.;
  • 学科 Religion.;Ethics.;History.;Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 215 p.
  • 总页数 215
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号