• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A Comparison of Descriptive Tagging Practices by Library, Archive and Museum Professionals using an Inter-Indexing Consistency Approach.
【24h】

A Comparison of Descriptive Tagging Practices by Library, Archive and Museum Professionals using an Inter-Indexing Consistency Approach.

机译：图书馆，档案馆和博物馆专业人员使用索引间一致性方法进行描述性标记做法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study is a comparison of the descriptive tagging practices among library, archive, and museum professionals using an inter-indexing consistency approach. The first purpose of this study was to determine the extent of the similarities and differences among professional groups when assigning descriptive tags to a wide variety of objects that may be found in any one or all three types of institutions (libraries, archives, and museums). Descriptive practices among information professionals were determined using measures of inter-indexer terminological consistency to compare frequencies in descriptive tagging outcomes. The second purpose of this study was to compare the descriptive practices of these three different groups of information professionals to different object types typically found within the library, archive, or museum environment. The number of tags applied per object type and professional group was measured via a two-way analysis of variance.;The objectives were to: (1) determine if there was a significant difference in the number of tags assigned to the four different object types by the three groups of information professionals; (2) determine if there was a significant difference in the number of exact matched tags among professional groups when describing the four object types, and; (3) determine if there was a significant difference among information professionals in the percentage of matched tags per object type.;Findings from this study indicate while there are few differences in depth of indexing per object type among professional groups, various levels of description were applied to the four different object types. Levels of description were derived from: (1) the three dimensional or physical media pictured; (2) the digital surrogate; (3) the objects aboutness ; (4) the technique and materials used to make the physical object, and; (5) written text. Data analysis also indicates there was a significant difference between means in the total number of descriptive tags and in the number of exact matched primary tags applied per object type. As such, information retrieval within the online environment could be improved if there was better quality control in the application of subject access points among information professionals across the library, archive, and museum environments.
机译：这项研究是使用索引间一致性方法对图书馆，档案馆和博物馆专业人员之间的描述性标记做法的比较。这项研究的第一个目的是确定在将描述性标签分配给在任何一种或所有三种类型的机构（图书馆，档案馆和博物馆）中都可以找到的各种对象时，确定专业群体之间的异同的程度。 。信息专业人员之间的描述性做法是使用索引间术语一致性的方法来确定的，以比较描述性标签结果中的频率。这项研究的第二个目的是将这三种不同类型的信息专业人员的描述做法与通常在图书馆，档案馆或博物馆环境中发现的不同对象类型进行比较。通过双向方差分析来衡量每种对象类型和专业组所应用标签的数量;目标是：（1）确定分配给四种不同对象类型的标签数量是否存在显着差异由三组信息专业人员组成； （2）在描述四种对象类型时，确定专业组之间的完全匹配标签的数量是否存在显着差异；以及（3）确定信息专业人员之间每种对象类型的匹配标签百分比是否存在显着差异。;本研究的结果表明，尽管专业组之间每种对象类型的索引深度差异不大，但各个级别的描述应用于四种不同的对象类型。描述级别来自以下方面：（1）所描绘的三维或物理媒体； （2）数字代理； （3）物体的关于性； （4）用于制造实物​​的技术和材料；以及（5）书面文字。数据分析还表明，在描述性标签总数和每种对象类型应用的完全匹配的主要标签数之间，均值之间存在显着差异。这样，如果在整个图书馆，档案馆和博物馆环境中的信息专业人员之间使用主题访问点进行更好的质量控制，则可以改善在线环境中的信息检索。

著录项

  • 作者

    Angel, Christine Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Carolina.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Carolina.;
  • 学科 Library Science.;Museology.;Information Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 298 p.
  • 总页数 298
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号