• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Rivalite et marches Une ethique adversative pour les agents economiques.
【24h】

Rivalite et marches Une ethique adversative pour les agents economiques.

机译：竞争与市场经济主体的对抗性道德。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The argument of my thesis can be summarised as follows: in the context of rivalry, an agent may attempt to satisfy his or her preferences at the expense of other agents' preferences if this generates social benefits that could not be generated otherwise (without producing too much harm). This argument leads to an adversarial ethics, that is, a description of our moral obligations in contexts like a sport competition or a trial. This ethics will be developed and applied to the behavior of economic agents in the market.;I will address two main questions. The first question focuses on the design of our social institutions. An adversarial scheme is a pattern of social interactions that fulfills its function through a dynamic of rivalry. Parts of our institutions can be modeled as adversarial schemes. When is it desirable to use these schemes? It is desirable if the balance between the scheme's functionality and harms is 1) acceptable and 2) preferable by comparison with other schemes. These two conditions yield a test. The test is developed in the first chapter. The second chapter argues that the market passes this test.;An agent must be allowed to adopt adversarial behaviors in an adversarial scheme. But this permission does not apply to his or her behavior outside the scheme or inside non-adversarial incorporated schemes (like a firm in the market or a team in sport competitions). These two criteria, once combined, yield a threefold distinction or a tripartition of the moral obligation of economic agents, which solves some of the problems with the shareholder primacy view and the stakeholder theory. The tripartition and its implications are presented in the third chapter.;The second question focuses on our moral obligations at the personal level. How ought we to behave in an adversarial scheme? In the fourth chapter, I argue that we ought to adopt the ideal of beneficial rivalry, which implies that we ought to: 1) contain our adversarial behaviors inside the scheme, 2) respect the scheme's rules and 3) adopt a behavior that will allow the scheme to pass the desirability test (developed in the first chapter). The fifth chapter argues that this ideal avoids some of the problems with Joseph Heath's ideal of healthy competition and Lynn Sharp Paine's ideal of positive competition.
机译：本论文的论点可以概括如下：在竞争的背景下，一个代理人可能会试图满足他或她的偏好，而这会产生其他代理人无法产生的社会利益（而不产生其他利益），而牺牲其他代理人的偏好。伤害很大）。这种论证导致了对抗性伦理，即在体育竞赛或审判等背景下对我们的道德义务的描述。将发展这种道德并将其应用于市场中经济主体的行为。我将解决两个主要问题。第一个问题集中在我们社会机构的设计上。对抗方案是社交互动的一种模式，通过动态竞争来实现其功能。我们机构的某些部分可以建模为对抗方案。什么时候需要使用这些方案？如果与其他方案相比，该方案的功能和危害之间的平衡是1）可以接受，并且2）是可取的，则是可取的。这两个条件进行测试。该测试在第一章中开发。第二章认为市场通过了这一检验。必须允许代理人在对抗方案中采取对抗行为。但是，此许可不适用于他或她在计划之外或在非对抗性公司计划内的行为（例如市场中的公司或体育比赛中的团队）。这两个标准结合在一起，就产生了经济主体的道德义务的三重区分或三重性，从而解决了股东至上观和利益相关者理论的一些问题。第三章介绍了三方关系及其含义。第二个问题集中在我们个人层面的道德义务上。在对抗方案中我们应该如何表现？在第四章中，我认为我们应该采用有益竞争的理想，这意味着我们应该：1）将我们的对抗行为包含在计划内，2）尊重计划的规则，3）采取允许通过合意性测试的方案（在第一章中开发）。第五章认为，这一理想避免了约瑟夫·希思的健康竞争理想和林恩·夏普·潘恩的积极竞争理想的某些问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Martin, Dominic Carl.;

  • 作者单位

    Universite de Montreal (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Universite de Montreal (Canada).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Ethics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 305 p.
  • 总页数 305
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号