首页> 外文学位 >NATO as social construction: Explaining cooperation and discord within the Atlantic community, 1956--1996.
【24h】

NATO as social construction: Explaining cooperation and discord within the Atlantic community, 1956--1996.

机译:北约作为社会建设:解释大西洋共同体内部的合作与不和谐,1956--1996年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Building on the premises of constructivist international relations theory, this dissertation analyzes the affect social variables have on international cooperation. Through a case study of seven crisis events within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), this research demonstrates how normative structures influence policy preferences. The central argument of this study is that international cooperation is rooted in a social-ideational context---that is a "system of knowledge"---that affects how political elites define and pursue political interests, and emphasizes the independent influence of social variables. More specifically, I argue that international cooperation is part of a larger discursive process of identity construction, rather than material-based strategic calculation, and may be expected to occur when consensus develops regarding elements of identity and an agreement upon appropriate behavior is reached. I further content that the process of defining a community's identity constitutes a discourse that ultimately shapes actors' conceptions of "self" and "other" as well as their understandings of the appropriate ways of relating to each other. This claim is based on the assumption that actors require an identity---which shapes preferences, goals, and interests---to act.; This study finds that material-based explanations of international cooperation are inadequate in a number of cases, and only partly explain others. In order to understand cooperation more thoroughly, endogenous pressures must be considered in addition to exogenous ones. Therefore, analysis in this study focuses on the interaction between the national and the international (that is, Atlantic community) structures. A tension often emerges between the state level and the international level as a result of conflict between two different discourses based upon differing perceptions of identity. Domestic structures, including normative and material, are constituted by and reinforce a particular state-level identity, that is, a specific set of collective beliefs and self-understandings of the public as well as political elites in relation to others. Similarly, international structures reflect the international community's shared identity characteristics and function to constrain antithetical actions and enable legitimate ones.; This study concludes that cooperation within NATO has failed or succeeded as part of a larger process of identity discourse, and is based upon certain principles of conduct, rather than particular material interests of members or the strategic security "exigencies" of a specific situation.
机译:本文在建构主义国际关系理论的前提下,分析了社会变量对国际合作的影响。通过对北大西洋公约组织(NATO)内七个危机事件的案例研究,该研究证明了规范结构如何影响政策偏好。这项研究的中心论点是,国际合作植根于社会意识形态的背景下,这是一种“知识体系”,它影响政治精英如何定义和追求政治利益,并强调社会的独立影响力。变量。更具体地说,我认为,国际合作是更大的身份建构话语过程的一部分,而不是基于物质的战略计算,并且可以预期,当就身份要素达成共识并就适当行为达成协议时,国际合作才可能发生。我进一步感到满意的是,定义社区身份的过程构成了一种话语,最终塑造了行为者对“自我”和“其他”的观念以及他们对适当的相互联系方式的理解。该主张基于这样的假设,即行为者需要一种身份-才能塑造偏好,目标和兴趣-才能采取行动。这项研究发现,在许多情况下,以材料为基础的国际合作解释是不够的,而在其他情况下只能部分解释。为了更全面地了解合作,除外源压力外,还必须考虑内源压力。因此,本研究的分析重点是国家结构与国际结构(即大西洋共同体)之间的相互作用。由于基于不同身份认同的两种不同话语之间的冲突,国家与国际之间经常会出现紧张关系。国内结构,包括规范性和物质性,是由特定的国家层面的身份构成并加强的,即特定的集体信念和公众以及与他人之间的政治精英的自我理解。同样,国际结构反映了国际社会的共同身份特征和功能,以约束对立的行动并促成合法的行动。这项研究得出的结论是,作为更大的身份讨论过程的一部分,北约内部的合作已经成功或失败,并且建立在某些行为原则之上,而不是基于成员的特定物质利益或特定情况的战略安全“紧急状态”。

著录项

  • 作者

    Majewski, John D.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Albany.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Albany.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 388 p.
  • 总页数 388
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号