• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Policy-Oriented Learning Among National Forest Stakeholders in the Pacific Northwest: Changes in Policy Beliefs Since Adoption of the Northwest Forest Plan.
【24h】

Policy-Oriented Learning Among National Forest Stakeholders in the Pacific Northwest: Changes in Policy Beliefs Since Adoption of the Northwest Forest Plan.

机译：西北太平洋国家森林利益相关者之间面向政策的学习：自西北森林计划通过以来政策观念的变化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study evaluates whether national forests stakeholders in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States have changed their national forest policy beliefs since adoption of the 1994 Northwest Forest Plan, and describes the extent to which scientific and technical information influences the revision of policy beliefs. The study tested assumptions of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) regarding the propensity for belief change, or policy-oriented learning, to occur in policy subsystems where conflict is intermediate and scientific information is widely available.;Semi-structured interviews with 20 individuals with long-term histories of involvement in regional national forest policy issues were conducted and analyzed. Interviewees were sorted into three advocacy coalitions: an amenity coalition most concerned with forest preservation, a commodity coalition most concerned with timber production, and a scientific management coalition most concerned with maximizing agency discretion and applying scientific expertise in management decisions. The majority of interviewees (80%) revised policy beliefs, however policy belief change results varied by advocacy coalition. Out of those who changed policy beliefs, 68.8% of individuals indicated revision of more than one policy belief. 71% of those who revised policy core beliefs also revised secondary beliefs while only 36% of participants who revised secondary beliefs also revised policy core beliefs. Furthermore, the study reveals instances of policy belief affirmation and examples of the absence of learning. Scientific information is not found to be a major influence upon policy-oriented learning. Instead, most interviewees attributed belief change to conflict resolution, experience with policy implementation, and the perception of environmental or social conditions.
机译：这项研究评估了自1994年《西北森林计划》通过以来美国西北太平洋地区的国家森林利益相关者是否改变了他们的国家森林政策信念，并描述了科技信息在多大程度上影响政策信念的修订。该研究测试了倡导联盟框架（ACF）的假设，即在冲突中间和广泛获得科学信息的政策子系统中发生信念改变或以政策为导向的学习倾向的可能性;与20个人的半结构化访谈对参与区域国家森林政策问题的长期历史进行了分析。受访者分为三个倡导联盟：一个最关心森林保护的便利性联盟，一个最关心木材生产的商品联盟以及一个最关心最大化机构自由裁量权和在管理决策中运用科学专业知识的科学管理联盟。大多数受访者（80％）修订了政策信念，但是政策信念变更的结果因倡导联盟而异。在那些改变了政策信念的人中，有68.8％的人表示修改了不止一种政策信念。修改政策核心信念的参与者中有71％的人也修改了次要信念，而修改次要信念的参与者中只有36％的人也修改了政策核心信念。此外，该研究还揭示了政策信念肯定的实例和缺乏学习的实例。没有发现科学信息对以政策为导向的学习有重大影响。相反，大多数受访者将信念改变归因于解决冲突，执行政策的经验以及对环境或社会条件的感知。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lange, Sarah E.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Political science.;Natural resource management.;Public administration.
  • 学位 Masters
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 94 p.
  • 总页数 94
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号