• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A critical analysis of Moscow's external policies towards Africa and the Middle East from Lenin to Gorbachev (Vladimir Il'ich Lenin, Mikhail Gorbachev, Russia).
【24h】

A critical analysis of Moscow's external policies towards Africa and the Middle East from Lenin to Gorbachev (Vladimir Il'ich Lenin, Mikhail Gorbachev, Russia).

机译：对莫斯科从列宁到戈尔巴乔夫的非洲和中东对外政策的批判性分析（弗拉基米尔·伊利希·列宁，俄罗斯米哈伊尔·戈尔巴乔夫）。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The principal objective of this study was to determine whether Marxist-Leninist ideology constituted the fundamental premise for the formulation and implementation of Soviet foreign policy, from the time of Lenin to Gorbachev, or whether Soviet national interests: security, strategic and economic, constituted the overriding premise.; The applied case study method of analysis will be used to develop the dissertation. The study will look at the motivations, tactics and methods for the formulation and implementation of Soviet foreign policy. It will also examine the similarities and differences in Soviet external conduct towards the two regions. Attempts will be made to cast explanations on why certain methods were used and why such differences existed.; The unique feature about this study is that it will seek to present the dissertation from the perspective of the developing countries. The study's conclusions will show that contrary to the postulations of many Soviet/Russian theorists, during the era under review, Soviet national interests: security, strategic and economic considerations constituted the core premise for the formulation and implementation of foreign policy. It will further show that, with respect to external relations, the dictates of Marxism-Leninism were often virtually sidelined by the various Soviet leaders.; Rather, the aforementioned core premise, coupled with pragmatism and in some instances, communist opportunism guided the formulation and implementation of Soviet foreign policy. In instances where Marxism-Leninism was a factor, it played a secondary role to the core premise.
机译：这项研究的主要目的是确定从列宁时代到戈尔巴乔夫时代，马克思列宁主义意识形态是否构成了制定和实施苏联外交政策的基本前提，还是构成了苏联的国家利益：安全，战略和经济？首要前提。本文将运用案例分析的方法进行研究。该研究将研究制定和实施苏联外交政策的动机，策略和方法。它还将研究苏联对这两个地区的外部行为的异同。将尝试解释为什么使用某些方法以及为什么存在这种差异。这项研究的独特之处在于它将寻求从发展中国家的角度介绍论文。该研究的结论将表明，与许多苏联/俄罗斯理论家的假设相反，在回顾时期，苏联的国家利益：安全，战略和经济考虑是制定和实施外交政策的核心前提。这将进一步表明，就对外关系而言，马克思列宁主义的命令实际上实际上已被苏联各方面领导人置之脑后。相反，上述核心前提，再加上实用主义和共产主义机会主义，指导了苏联外交政策的制定和实施。在马克思列宁主义是一个因素的情况下，它在核心前提中起着次要作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Aryee, James Bennett.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Manitoba (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Manitoba (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 245 p.
  • 总页数 245
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号