• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A Study in the Logic of Institutions.
【24h】

A Study in the Logic of Institutions.

机译：制度逻辑研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In my dissertation A Study in the Logic of Institutions I develop a logical system for reasoning about institutions and their consistency. Since my dissertation is a work in logic rather than one in socio-political philosophy, I don't defend a particular theory of institutions. Instead, I did as Yogi Bera suggested and simply took the fork in the road. A well-developed account of institutions is given by John Searle in (1995); in (2010); His account bases all social reality on language, and I use his account to provide a logic for institutional norms.;Briefly, social reality is constructed via language by making our intentions clear to one another. And we do this via speech acts. There is one particular type of speech act that is important to institutions: declarations. Declarations bring about new social objects and create social states of affairs. It is via declarations that social institutions are created. In so far as groups recognize an institution sustaining/making authority, that authority has the ability to generate new institutional rules via declarations.;According to Vanderveken (1990, 1991); see also Searle and Vanderveken (1985), speech acts have a logic. That is, performing one speech act can satisfy the conditions of having performed another speech act. A priest declaring a baby baptized will also make it so that the priest has asserted that the baby is baptized, for instance. More importantly, certain declarations will result in the declarations of some of the logical consequences of the initial declarations. I characterize the set of speech acts that stand in that relationship and develop a logical system around that characterization.;The formal framework incorporates action and permits representations of complex institution-dependent relations, e.g., rights and duties. I further develop this formalism to investigate the notion of normative consistency. I show how to represent at least a minimal conception of normative inconsistency within the formal framework, and characterize its properties. I conclude by comparing my work to that of others.
机译：在我的论文《制度逻辑研究》中，我开发了一个逻辑系统来推理制度及其一致性。因为我的论文是逻辑学的著作，而不是社会政治哲学的著作，所以我不捍卫特定的制度理论。相反，我按照瑜伽士贝拉（Yogi Bera）的建议去做，只是把叉子叉了起来。约翰·塞尔（John Searle）（1995）对制度进行了完善的阐述。在2010年）;他的叙述将所有社会现实都建立在语言的基础上，而我使用他的叙述为制度规范提供了逻辑。简而言之，社会现实是通过语言使我们的意图彼此明确而构建的。我们通过言语行为做到这一点。对于机构而言，一种特殊的言语行为类型很重要：声明。宣言带来了新的社会对象并创造了社会事务状态。社会机构是通过宣言建立的。就各团体而言，只要承认一个机构具有维持/制定权力的权力，该权力就可以通过声明产生新的制度规则。根据范德维肯（1990，1991）;参见Searle和Vanderveken（1985），言语行为具有逻辑性。即，执行一个语音动作可以满足执行另一语音动作的条件。牧师宣布受洗的婴儿也会这样做，例如，牧师声称婴儿已受洗。更重要的是，某些声明将导致声明初始声明的某些逻辑结果。我描述了代表该关系的一系列言语行为，并围绕该描述建立了一个逻辑系统。;正式框架将行为纳入其中，并允许代表与机构相关的复杂关系，例如权利和义务。我进一步发展了这种形式主义，以研究规范一致性的概念。我将展示如何在正式框架中至少表示最小的规范不一致概念，并描述其特性。最后，我将自己的作品与他人的作品进行比较。

著录项

  • 作者

    Payette, Gillman.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Calgary (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Calgary (Canada).;
  • 学科 Logic.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 264 p.
  • 总页数 264
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号