• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The Paradox of the Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction and Husserl's Genealogy of the Mathematization of Nature.
【24h】

The Paradox of the Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction and Husserl's Genealogy of the Mathematization of Nature.

机译：第一，第二质量区分的悖论与胡塞尔的自然数学化家谱。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Since the time of Galileo, philosophers widely agree on a distinction that has been known since Locke as the distinction between "primary" and "secondary" qualities. In spite of claiming that experiences or ideas of secondary qualities must be produced by configurations and movements of particles constituted of primary qualities, philosophers such as Descartes and Locke also claim that the connection between primary qualities and ideas of secondary qualities is inconceivable. The combination of the two claims I call the "paradox of the primary-secondary quality distinction." The philosophical disputes around the distinction usually ignore the paradox, and instead circle around different types of explanations of secondary qualities in terms of primary qualities: projectivism, eliminativism, physicalism, and dispositionalism. These contradict each other ontologically, but nevertheless they share a common origin: the view that the world is mathematical in itself.;Edmund Husserl claims in the Crisis that this conception entails a misunderstanding and sets out to explain the confusion in the genesis of the mathematical concept of the world; a genesis he calls the "mathematization of nature." I analyze four different steps in the mathematization: generalization, idealization, formalization, and symbolization. The combination of these steps leads to, in Husserl's estimation, a confusion of "true being" with "a method." Husserl thinks that true being is experienced in the life-world, and that it can only be substructed, but never replaced with mathematizations. Contrary to what is often thought, Husserl's concept of the life-world is not simply a belated response to Heidegger, but Husserl's ultimate expression of his lifelong study of the relation of mathematics and experience. The result of the forgetting of original experience is, according to Husserl, the "crisis of the European sciences." The recovery of the experience that is the origin of the mathematization is for Husserl thus not only a way to avoid the philosophical misunderstanding of science, but also an answer to a profound crisis of meaning.;Husserl's genealogy of the mathematization allows for a neat explanation for why the paradox seems unavoidable. Ideas of secondary qualities are not directly mathematizeable, and therefore it seems that they must be produced by primary qualities. Yet, the connection between them is inconceivable because mathematizations are compared to something radically different, namely experiential qualities. Whether we agree with Husserl's own account of life-worldly experience and crisis or not: his genealogy of the development of the paradox reveals the need to reconsider the role of experience in the scientific concept of the world.
机译：自伽利略时代以来，哲学家广泛同意一种区别，这种区别自洛克以来就被称为“主要”和“次要”质量之间的区别。尽管声称必须通过构成初级品质的粒子的构造和运动来产生次级品质的经验或思想，但笛卡尔和洛克等哲学家也认为，初级品质与次级品质的思想之间的联系是不可想象的。我将这两种说法结合起来称为“初次-二次质量区分的悖论”。围绕区别的哲学争论通常忽略了悖论，而是围绕主要素质：投射主义，消极主义，物理主义和性倾向主义，围绕次要素质的不同类型的解释进行盘旋。这些在本体论上相互矛盾，但是尽管如此，它们有一个共同的起源：关于世界本身就是数学的观点。；埃德蒙·胡塞尔在《危机》中声称，这一概念引起误解，并着手解释数学起源中的困惑。世界观；他称其为“自然的数学化”。我分析了数学化的四个不同步骤：概括，理想化，形式化和符号化。在胡塞尔的估计中，这些步骤的结合导致“真实存在”与“方法”的混淆。胡塞尔认为，真实世界是生活世界中经历的事物，它只能被继承，而不能被数学化所取代。与通常认为的相反，胡塞尔的生活世界概念不仅是对海德格尔的迟来的回应，而且是胡塞尔对数学与经验之间关系的终生研究的最终表达。侯赛尔认为，忘记原始经验的结果就是“欧洲科学危机”。对作为数学化起源的经验的恢复对胡塞尔来说，因此不仅是避免科学的哲学误解的方法，而且是对深刻意义危机的一种答案。；胡塞尔对数学化的谱系学可以做出一个简洁的解释。为什么悖论似乎不可避免。次要品质的概念不能直接数学化，因此似乎必须由主要品质产生。但是，它们之间的联系是不可想象的，因为将数学与根本不同的东西（即体验质量）进行了比较。无论我们是否同意胡塞尔自己关于现实世界经验和危机的描述：他对悖论发展的家谱表明，有必要重新考虑经验在世界科学概念中的作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Durt, Christoph.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Cruz.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Cruz.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Metaphysics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 222 p.
  • 总页数 222
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号