首页> 外文学位 >Symbol Grounding Using Neural Networks.
【24h】

Symbol Grounding Using Neural Networks.

机译:使用神经网络进行符号接地。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The classical approach to artificial intelligence (i.e. symbol manipulation) and the connectionist approach (artificial neural networks) have been criticized for their inadequacies. The philosopher John Searle's Chinese room thought experiment argued that symbolic systems have no understanding of the meaning contained in their representations. The philosophers Jerry Fodor and Zenon Pylyshyn argued that artificial neural networks could not exhibit certain features of human cognition, such as systematicity and composition of representations. We take the view that both of these problems can be solved by a suitable integration of connectionist and symbolic systems. In this work we investigate methods of using artificial neural networks to produce descriptions in propositional and predicate logic. Artificial neural networks are stuctured such that, upon training, simple features of the network correspond directly to either propositional variables in one case, and objects and predicates in the other. In both cases, the methods were tested on character recognition tasks.
机译:人工智能的经典方法(即符号操作)和连接主义方法(人工神经网络)因其不足之处而受到批评。哲学家约翰·塞尔(John Searle)的中国房间思想实验认为,符号系统对它们表示中的含义不了解。哲学家杰里·福多(Jerry Fodor)和泽农·皮利申(Zenon Pylyshyn)认为,人工神经网络无法展现人类认知的某些特征,例如系统性和表征的组成。我们认为,可以通过将连接主义和符号系统进行适当的集成来解决这两个问题。在这项工作中,我们研究了使用人工神经网络在命题和谓词逻辑中产生描述的方法。人工神经网络的结构使得在训练时,网络的简单特征在一种情况下直接对应于命题变量,而在另一种情况下对应于宾语和谓语。在这两种情况下,都对字符识别任务进行了测试。

著录项

  • 作者

    Horvitz, Richard.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati.;

  • 授予单位 University of Cincinnati.;
  • 学科 Artificial Intelligence.;Computer Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 126 p.
  • 总页数 126
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号