• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Rhetorical analysis of arguments made in the climate change debate: Argument families and social network links as potential bases for agreement.
【24h】

Rhetorical analysis of arguments made in the climate change debate: Argument families and social network links as potential bases for agreement.

机译：对气候变化辩论中的论点进行修辞分析：论点家庭和社交网络链接为达成协议的潜在基础。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The issue of climate change brings together some of the most important sociological issues of the age, including global governance, the role of industrialization and capitalism in degrading the environment, the relationship between humans and non-human nature, and the inequality of nations. However, it is an open question whether societies and countries of the world can come to agreement about the meaning of climate change and actions (or no action) that should be taken to address it. To avoid privileging one or another of the issue's aspects, this study used a discursive and rhetorical approach to include all the arguments made in the debate on an equal footing. First, 100 documents that make arguments about climate change were analyzed to characterize the arguments made and to distinguish four rhetorical elements: the personal and organizational sources of authority for the rhetor, the type(s) of evidence used for the claims made, the worldview(s) expressed, and the actions proposed. This analysis provided the basis for categorizing the documents into "families," coherent arguments made about the climate change issue; and performing a social network analysis to discern linkages formed by the argument families and rhetorical elements that might be the basis for coming to agreement about climate change issues. The study found coherence within families as well as multiple links across families, indicating that rhetors in the climate change debate form a dense network of ties that could be used to build agreement.
机译：气候变化问题汇集了该时代一些最重要的社会学问题，包括全球治理，工业化和资本主义在破坏环境方面的作用，人类与非人类之间的关系以及国家的不平等。但是，这是一个悬而未决的问题，世界社会和国家是否可以就气候变化的含义以及应采取的行动（或不采取行动）达成共识。为了避免使问题的一个或另一个方面陷入歧义，本研究使用了一种话语和修辞方法，以平等的基础纳入了辩论中提出的所有论点。首先，分析了100篇有关气候变化的论据，以描述论据的特征并区分四个修辞元素：修辞者的个人和组织权威来源，用于提出主张的证据类型，世界观（s）表示，并建议采取的行动。该分析为将文件归类为“家庭”提供了基础，这是有关气候变化问题的连贯论点。进行社交网络分析，以辨别论点家族和修辞元素形成的联系，这些联系可能是就气候变化问题达成协议的基础。该研究发现了家庭内部的连贯性，以及家庭之间的多重联系，这表明气候变化辩论中的言论形成了紧密的联系网络，可用于建立共识。

著录项

  • 作者

    Malone, Elizabeth L.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland, College Park.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland, College Park.;
  • 学科 Sociology Theory and Methods.;Sociology General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 366 p.
  • 总页数 366
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号