首页> 外文学位 >Relationship of the nonverbal unable to self-rate pain scale and verbal scale on adult post-operative patients.
【24h】

Relationship of the nonverbal unable to self-rate pain scale and verbal scale on adult post-operative patients.

机译:成年术后患者非言语无法自我评价的疼痛量表和言语量表的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Pain and how to measure pain has always been a challenge to the profession of nursing. The best way to assess patients' pain is by having them self-report or verbally inform the healthcare provider by evaluating how the pain feels. The American Pain Society calls the self-report of pain the "Gold Standard of Pain Assessment." The struggle as to how to measure pain occurs when a patient is unable to verbally explain to the nurse that they are in pain/the severity of their pain or if there is a new type of pain they are experiencing. The Nonverbal/Unable to Self-Rate Pain Scale is a tool utilized to help rate pain nonverbally for those who are unable to communicate pain. This tool is a combination of three different nonverbal pain scales which had not been shown to have a relationship with a verbal pain score. This quantitative pilot study compared post-operative patients' reported verbal pain score with the score the principal investigator observed, utilizing the Nonverbal/Unable to Self-Rate Pain Scale. The sample was a convenience sample. The study was conducted at a suburban hospital containing 150 beds. The unit participating in the study was a 47 bed medical/surgical floor specializing in bariatric surgery. The data were analyzed utilizing simple and descriptive statistics. The theoretical framework utilized for this study was Kolcaba's Comfort Theory. The outcome of this study revealed that a nonverbal observed pain score was consistently lower than the verbal pain scores reported by post-operative patients. The clinical implications are the Nonverbal/Unable to Self-Rate Pain Scale is not a useful tool in measuring pain. However, the study did find that the Nonverbal/Unable to Self-Rate Pain Scale was more accurate with the male population. Further input with a broader patient scope could further and better evaluate the effectiveness of the pain scale utilized.
机译:疼痛以及如何测量疼痛一直是护理行业的挑战。评估患者疼痛的最好方法是让他们自我报告,或者通过评估疼痛的感觉来口头告知医疗服务提供者。美国疼痛学会将疼痛的自我报告称为“疼痛评估的金标准”。当患者无法向护士口头解释他们的疼痛/疼痛的严重程度,或者是否正在经历新型的疼痛时,就会发生有关如何测量疼痛的争论。非言语/无法自评痛苦量表是一种工具,用于为无法传达痛苦的人非言语地评估痛苦。该工具是三种不同的非语言疼痛量表的组合,这些量表尚未显示出与语言疼痛评分之间的关​​系。这项定量的先导研究使用非语言/无能力自评疼痛量表,比较了术后患者的口头疼痛评分与主要研究者观察到的评分。该样品是方便样品。该研究是在有150张病床的郊区医院进行的。参与该研究的单位是47床的医学/外科地板,专门用于减肥手术。使用简单的描述性统计数据对数据进行了分析。这项研究使用的理论框架是科尔卡巴的舒适理论。这项研究的结果表明,观察到的非语言疼痛评分始终低于术后患者报告的口头疼痛评分。临床意义是非语言/无法自行定额疼痛量表不是衡量疼痛的有用工具。但是,该研究确实发现,非言语/无法自评痛苦量表对于男性人群更为准确。在更广泛的患者范围内进行进一步的输入可以进一步更好地评估所用疼痛量表的有效性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wood, Sarah.;

  • 作者单位

    Northern Kentucky University.;

  • 授予单位 Northern Kentucky University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Nursing.
  • 学位 M.S.N.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 46 p.
  • 总页数 46
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号