首页> 外文学位 >Social influence in interpersonal relationships: An examination of parents', peers', and mass media's ability to instill antisocial communication.
【24h】

Social influence in interpersonal relationships: An examination of parents', peers', and mass media's ability to instill antisocial communication.

机译:人际关系中的社会影响力:检查父母,同龄人和大众媒体灌输反社会沟通的能力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Using a synthesized model, three socializing agents (parents, peers, and mass media characters) were investigated to determine the influence that each had in regard to instilling beliefs about and behavioral tendencies for antisocial communication. Thus, based on the theoretical model, three studies were conducted to test predictions regarding antisocial communication. Studies 1 and 2 examined how individuals learn to use antisocial communication, and Study 3 examined why antisocial communication is used in romantic relationships.; As predicted in Study 1, parents (R2 = .33) were found to have the strongest relationship to an individual's general social domain of knowledge, while peers (R 2 = .40) were found to have the strongest relationship to specific domains of knowledge regarding antisocial communication. In Study 2, as predicted, peers had a large effect (R 2 = .40--.47), mass media characters held a moderate effect ( R2 = .17--.20), and opposite to prediction, parents held a large effect (R2 = .29--.34), on beliefs about antisocial communication.; In Study 3, a multifactorial design was used to examine the effect of the three social agents and two contextual factors (social power, relationship duration) on an individual's actual use of antisocial communication across two within-subjects contexts (emotional, physical). A main effect was detected for relationship duration across contexts (Eta2 = .01--.03), and for each social agent within the physical context (peers: Eta2 = .05; parents: Eta2 = .04; media characters: Eta2 = .02).; Four conclusions were drawn from these studies: (1) social agents have differential socializing effects on instilling beliefs about antisocial communication, (2) relationships that are more established are likely to involve greater levels of antisocial communication than new relationships, (3) topics that are less socially normed (e.g., seeking an emotional disclosure) are likely to involve greater levels of antisocial communication than topics that are more socially normed (e.g., seeking physical intimacy), and (4) models explaining the use of antisocial behavior are likely to require a synthesis of theoretical constructs that include cognitive processes, individual dispositions, and situational factors. The implications of the current findings for intervention/prevention efforts and for future research are discussed.
机译:使用综合模型,调查了三个社交媒介(父母,同伴和大众媒体角色),以确定每个人在灌输关于反社会沟通的信念和行为倾向方面的影响。因此,在理论模型的基础上,进行了三项研究以检验有关反社会沟通的预测。研究1和2研究了个人如何学习使用反社会交流,研究3研究了为什么在浪漫关系中使用反社会交流。正如研究1所预测的,发现父母(R2 = .33)与个人的一般社会知识领域之间的关系最强,而同伴(R 2 = .40)与特定知识领域的关系最强关于反社会沟通。在研究2中,正如预测的那样,同龄人的影响很大(R 2 = .40-。47),大众媒体角色的影响中等(R2 = .17-。20),与预测相反,父母的影响力很大。对反社会沟通的信念产生很大影响(R2 = .29-。34);在研究3中,采用多因素设计来研究三种社会因素和两种情境因素(社会力量,关系持续时间)对个体在两个主题内情境(情感,身体)上实际使用反社会沟通的影响。在跨情境的关系持续时间(Eta2 = .01-。03)和物理情境内的每个社交代理(同伴:Eta2 = .05;父母:Eta2 = .04;媒体角色:Eta2 = .02)。从这些研究中得出四个结论:(1)社会行为者在灌输关于反社会沟通的信念方面具有不同的社会化作用;(2)与新的关系相比,较牢固的关系可能包含更高水平的反社会沟通,(3)与具有较高社会规范性(例如,寻求身体亲密关系)的话题相比,具有较低社会规范性(例如,寻求情感披露)的人可能会涉及更高水平的反社会沟通,并且(4)解释使用反社会行为的模型可能会要求综合包括认知过程,个人性格和情境因素在内的理论结构。讨论了当前发现对干预/预防工作以及未来研究的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cvancara, Kristen Eis.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Speech Communication.; Mass Communications.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 483 p.
  • 总页数 483
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;传播理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号