• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The Turn to the Political: Post-Marxism and Marx's Critique of Politics.
【24h】

The Turn to the Political: Post-Marxism and Marx's Critique of Politics.

机译：转向政治：后马克思主义和马克思的政治批判。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Recent political theorists have emphasize the importance of the concept of the political, and criticized earlier theorists, especially Marxists, for dissolving the political in other concepts, especially reducing politics to economics. Marx, however, did not reduce the political to the economic, but instead subjected the category of the political to a sophisticated critique, in his early work, which influenced the direction of all his later work. Following Marx's critique of politics, this dissertation argues against the autonomy of the political, and proposes a political theory which sees politics as inseparable from a wider social and economic context.;The dissertation begins with a discussion of four post-Marxist authors, Badiou, Laclau, Mouffe, and Ranciere, who respond to perceived problems in Marxism (particularly the Marxism of Althusser) by emphasizing the autonomy of the political. It then traces Marx's critique of politics throughout his work, beginning with his early identification of the separation of the political and the economic as a "practical illusion," a kind of appearance which is not simply a pretense or error, but which has material effects. The dissertation then discusses how Marx developed this account of the relationship between politics and appearance in the Eighteenth Brumaire and Communist Manifesto, before turning to Marx's most sophisticated analysis of the logic of appearance, the identification of commodity fetishism in Capital. The dissertation concludes with a discussion of the implications of Marx's critique of politics for contemporary political theory.;The analysis of post-Marxism and of Marx in this dissertation, then, shows the limitations of the turn to the political, and the ways in which a focus on the political as an autonomous sphere produces a political theory that is incapable of understanding the richness of politics. The reading of Marx also demonstrates a better approach to political theory, one which, through an analysis of politics as appearance, reveals the many intersections and imbrications of the apparently political and the supposedly non-political. In many ways, this analysis is only the beginning, the announcement of a further research program which would found political theory not on the political alone, but on politics, economics, aesthetics and all the other fields into which our discussion of political concepts might take us. Such an investigation could draw on Marxist and non-Marxist theories, being limited neither by the purified notion of politics of post-Marxist, nor by the parochial textualism of too much Marxist theory. What this dissertation proposes is a reconceptualization of political theory which, by rejecting the autonomy of the political, is able to pay full attention to the richness of politics.
机译：最近的政治理论家强调政治概念的重要性，并批评了较早的理论家，特别是马克思主义者，将政治溶解在其他概念中，特别是将政治还原为经济学。但是，马克思并没有把政治从经济上还原为政治，而是在他的早期工作中对政治范畴进行了复杂的批判，这影响了他以后所有工作的方向。继马克思对政治的批判之后，本文提出了反对政治自治的主张，并提出了一种政治理论，认为政治与更广泛的社会和经济环境密不可分。论文首先讨论了四位后马克思主义作家巴迪欧， Laclau，Mouffe和Ranciere，他们通过强调政治自治来回应马克思主义（尤其是阿尔都塞的马克思主义）中的感知问题。然后，它追溯了马克思在其整个工作中对政治的批评，首先是他将政治和经济的分离早期确认为“实践的幻想”，这种表象不仅是假装或错误，而且具有实质性的影响。 。然后，论文讨论了马克思如何在《第十八届布鲁梅尔和共产党宣言》中发展出对政治与外表之间关系的这种解释，然后再转向马克思对外表逻辑，资本主义商品拜物教的识别进行最复杂的分析。论文的最后讨论了马克思对政治的批判对当代政治理论的影响。本文对后马克思主义和马克思的分析，表明了转向政治的局限性，以及转向政治的方式。将政治作为自治领域的焦点产生了无法理解政治丰富性的政治理论。马克思的读物也展示了一种更好的政治理论方法，该方法通过对政治的表象进行分析，揭示了看似政治的和所谓的非政治的许多交集和影响。在许多方面，这种分析只是开始，是进一步研究计划的宣布，该计划将发现政治理论不仅仅涉及政治，还涉及政治，经济学，美学以及我们对政治概念的讨论可能涉及的所有其他领域。我们。这样的研究可以借鉴马克思主义和非马克思主义的理论，既不受后马克思主义政治纯洁概念的限制，也不受过多的马克思主义理论的狭text的文本主义的限制。本文提出的是对政治理论的重新概念化，通过拒绝政治自治，可以充分关注政治的丰富性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fisken, Timothy David.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 132 p.
  • 总页数 132
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号