• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The Arab Nahdha projects and the Arab intellectuals' perspectives of modernity and social change in the Arab world
【24h】

The Arab Nahdha projects and the Arab intellectuals' perspectives of modernity and social change in the Arab world

机译：阿拉伯Nahdha项目和阿拉伯知识分子对阿拉伯世界现代性和社会变革的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Since the introduction of modernity to the Arab World in 1798, the Arab World has experienced three attempts of modernization called (Arab Nahdha projects). These projects served as the theoretical and practical agenda for social change, designed for achieving liberty, progress and prosperity. The first two projects (1815--1837, and 1952--1970) failed, and the Arab World is currently going through the third attempt. The failure of the Nahdha projects, and the persistence of backwardness of the Arab World have resulted in rich and diverse intellectual writings about modernity and the desired social change in the Arab World.;This qualitative study analyzes the Arab intellectuals' perspectives regarding modernity and social change in the Arab World. A classification of the main trends and currents of the Arab Intellectuals' thoughts is formulated as a methodological tool. This classification divides the intellectual thought into two main categories: modernity in Focus and modernity marginal. Each category is further divided, and the thought of each intellectual representing each main current is reviewed, discussed and analyzed in detail.;Building on this classification, the analysis of the thought of Sadik Jalal al-Azm represents the extreme secular current, whereas the thought of Mohammad Arkoun represents the moderate secular current. While the ideas of Sayyid Qutb represents the Salafi current, the thought of Mohammad Abid al-Jabiri represents the reconciliatory current.;The analysis clearly demonstrates the divers macro-perspectives of these intellectuals particularly in their interpretations of the causes of backwardness, and the agenda proposed for solutions and social change in the Arab World. In addition, this study shows a noticeable gap between the macro-perspectives of the intellectuals and the findings of some empirical micro-studies. This study demonstrates the inadequacy of relying on one single approach and proposes the integration of both macro and micro perspectives. Therefore, this study suggests integration between the macro and the micro perspectives in interdisciplinary studies about the social reality of the Arab World.
机译：自从1798年将现代性引入阿拉伯世界以来，阿拉伯世界就经历了三次现代化尝试（阿拉伯语Nahdha项目）。这些项目是社会变革的理论和实践议程，旨在实现自由，进步和繁荣。前两个项目（1815--1837和1952--1970）失败了，阿拉伯世界目前正在进行第三次尝试。 Nahdha项目的失败，以及阿拉伯世界的落后的持续存在，导致了关于现代性和阿拉伯世界所期望的社会变革的丰富而多样的知识分子著作。该定性研究分析了阿拉伯知识分子关于现代性和社会性的观点。阿拉伯世界的变化。阿拉伯知识分子思想的主要趋势和潮流分类被作为一种方法论工具。这种分类将知识思想分为两大类：“焦点论的现代性”和“边缘性的现代性”。每个类别进一步划分，代表每个主要潮流的每个知识分子的思想都被审查，讨论和分析。在此分类的基础上，对萨迪克·贾拉勒·阿兹姆思想的分析代表了极端的世俗潮流，而穆罕默德·阿库恩（Mohammad Arkoun）的思想代表了适度的世俗潮流。虽然赛义德·库特（Sayyid Qutb）的思想代表着萨拉菲潮流，但穆罕默德·阿比德·贾比里（Mohammad Abid al-Jabiri）的思想代表着和解潮流。该分析清楚地证明了这些知识分子的潜水者宏观视角，尤其是他们对落后原因和议程的解释。提出解决方案和阿拉伯世界的社会变革的建议。此外，这项研究表明，知识分子的宏观观点与一些经验微观研究的发现之间存在明显的差距。这项研究证明了依靠单一方法的不足，并提出了宏观和微观观点的整合。因此，这项研究表明在有关阿拉伯世界社会现实的跨学科研究中，宏观和微观观点之间的整合。

著录项

  • 作者

    Al-Sulaim, Fatimah Abdullah.;

  • 作者单位

    American University.;

  • 授予单位 American University.;
  • 学科 Social structure.;Middle Eastern history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 328 p.
  • 总页数 328
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号