• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >International legal relations: Determining antitrust jurisdiction across borders.
【24h】

International legal relations: Determining antitrust jurisdiction across borders.

机译：国际法律关系：确定跨国界的反托拉斯管辖权。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study engages the discussion between dualists and monists over a normative determination of cross-border jurisdiction. Inherently involved is a consideration of a transnational view, considering international law with national laws. The study also considers United States, Argentina, and Brazil's respective national laws, agencies, and how they administer antitrust. While addressing Mercosur and the United States, the study translates possible implications to the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) and the development of international legal relations, as a proactive approach to jurisdictional conflicts.; This study assumes that the normative determination of jurisdiction to apply antitrust law to cross-border energy activity is necessary to coincide with regional and hemispheric FTAA goals. The study's hypothesis is that energy sector activity across borders requires appropriate antitrust jurisdiction. Therefore, should a transnational approach be sought to determine jurisdiction?; The backdrop of the study is the energy sector between the United States and Mercosur as it develops within the FTAA. Through the dualist and monist debate, the study addresses judicial approaches to potential jurisdictional conflicts as activities cross national borders and domestic regulations are sought to be enforced. United States case law is utilized along with the Restatements of Law for Foreign Relations and for Conflicts of Law. The study also discusses international jurisdictional principles in light of relevant case law. As such, the study addresses judicial discretion in the use of comity as a conflict of laws approach when jurisdiction appears concurrent. In so doing, the study addresses the balancing of interests approach along with the proverbial canons of construction, i.e., the presumption in favor of international law and the presumption against extraterritoriality. It synthesizes transnational considerations by assessing and suggesting the establishment of an energy jurisdictional commission to determine appropriate jurisdiction. It surveys several potential models to emulate. It attempts to establish the ground work for the development of international legal relations instead of having varied judicial decisions setting precedent, which to date appears inconsistent and not fruitful for the establishment of a reliable legal system to determine jurisdiction for antitrust across national borders.
机译：这项研究使二元论者和一元论者之间就跨界管辖权的规范确定进行了讨论。本质上涉及的是对跨国观点的考虑，同时考虑国际法和国内法。该研究还考虑了美国，阿根廷和巴西各自的国家法律，机构，以及它们如何管理反托拉斯。在探讨南方共同市场和美国的同时，作为对管辖权冲突的一种积极方法，该研究翻译了对美洲自由贸易区（FTAA）和国际法律关系发展的可能影响。这项研究假设将反托拉斯法应用于跨境能源活动的管辖权的规范确定与区域和半球FTAA目标一致是必要的。该研究的假设是，跨境能源部门的活动需要适当的反托拉斯管辖权。因此，是否应寻求跨国方法来确定管辖权？这项研究的背景是美国与南方共同市场之间在FTAA中发展的能源部门。通过二元论和一元论的辩论，该研究探讨了针对可能发生的管辖权冲突的司法方法，因为这些活动跨越了国界，并寻求执行国内法规。美国判例法与《对外关系和法律冲突法重述》一起使用。该研究还根据相关判例法讨论了国际管辖权原则。因此，该研究针对司法管辖权并发时使用礼让作为法律冲突方法的司法裁量权。在此过程中，该研究探讨了利益平衡的方法以及众所周知的建构准则，即支持国际法的推定和反对域外性的推定。它通过评估和建议建立能源管辖权委员会来确定适当的管辖权，综合了跨国考虑因素。它调查了几种可能的模型进行仿真。它试图为发展国际法律关系奠定基础，而不是通过各种司法决定树立先例，迄今为止，这对于建立可靠的法律制度来确定跨国界反托拉斯管辖权似乎是前后矛盾的，也没有成果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lorenzo, Jose Blas, Jr.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Denver.;

  • 授予单位 University of Denver.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.; Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 371 p.
  • 总页数 371
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;法律;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号