Critique of Pure Reason, one finds a whole battery of fierce attacks on core doctrines of Leibnizia'/> Leibniz freed of every flaw: A Kantian reads Leibnizian metaphysics (Immanuel Kant, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz).
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Leibniz freed of every flaw: A Kantian reads Leibnizian metaphysics (Immanuel Kant, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz).
【24h】

Leibniz freed of every flaw: A Kantian reads Leibnizian metaphysics (Immanuel Kant, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz).

机译：莱布尼兹（Leibniz）摆脱了每一个缺陷：一个康德人阅读莱布尼兹的形而上学（Immanuel Kant，Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz）。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In Immanuel Kant's pre-critical writings as well as in his main critical work, the Critique of Pure Reason, one finds a whole battery of fierce attacks on core doctrines of Leibnizian philosophy, e.g., the monadology, the principle of the identity of indiscernibles, the principle of sufficient reason, the doctrine of the pre-established harmony, or the relationalist theory of space and time. It is tempting to read Kant's philosophical development as a gradual emancipation from his Leibnizian upbringing, culminating in a thorough rejection of Leibnizian philosophy as a paradigm case of the kind of dogmatic metaphysics that Kant wants to overcome with his critical philosophy.; But in addition to the familiar texts in which Kant attacks the Leibnizians there are several curious, less well-discussed passages in which Kant speaks in highly approving terms of Leibniz. In these passages Kant self-avowedly defends Leibniz against his Leibniz-Wolffian followers who, according to Kant, have seriously misunderstood Leibniz's original position. Kant maintains that a correct reading of Leibniz reveals that his own and Leibniz's views are in fact very close, and that with regard to many issues that are central to transcendental idealism Leibniz had already tried to say what Kant then made explicit in his critical work.; The project of this essay is to lay the foundation for the examination of an unorthodox reading of the relation between Leibnizian metaphysics and Kantian transcendental idealism, according to which Kant's critical philosophy can correctly be described as the “true apology of Leibniz”, as Kant claims, while Kant's sharply critical objections in the pre-critical works and in the Critique of Pure Reason for the most part don't apply to Leibniz's original theory but to Leibniz-Wolffian school-philosophy. The present essay provides the necessary groundwork for the examination of this unorthodox reading by showing that, and to what extent these Kantian objections do not apply to Leibniz himself, and by arguing that Kant's reading of certain central Leibnizian doctrines in which Leibnizian metaphysics is represented as a forerunner of transcendental idealism is indeed defensible.
机译：在伊曼纽尔·康德（Immanuel Kant）的批评前著作以及他的主要批评著作《纯理性批判》中，人们发现对莱布尼兹哲学的核心学说，例如一元论，不可区分的身份原则，充分理由原则，预先建立的和谐学说或时空关系论。试图把康德的哲学发展看作是从他的莱布尼兹教育中逐渐解放出来的结果，最终导致人们彻底拒绝了莱布尼兹哲学作为康德想要用他的批判哲学克服的那种教条形而上学的范例。但是，除了康德抨击莱布尼兹主义者的熟悉文献之外，康德还用几条好奇且讨论较少的段落对莱布尼兹表示赞赏。在这些段落中，康德自觉地捍卫了莱布尼兹，以抵抗他的莱布尼兹-沃尔夫派信徒，据康德称，这些信徒严重误解了莱布尼兹的原始立场。康德坚持认为，对莱布尼兹的正确解读表明，他和莱布尼兹的观点实际上是非常接近的，并且对于超越先验唯心主义至关重要的许多问题，莱布尼兹已经试图说出康德随后在他的批判工作中所表达的内容。 ;本文的目的是为检验对莱布尼兹形而上学与康德先验唯心主义之间关系的非正统理解奠定基础，据此，康德认为，康德的批判哲学可以正确地描述为“莱布尼兹的真正道歉”。 ，而康德在批判前作品和《纯理性批判》中的强烈批判性反对绝大部分不适用于莱布尼兹的原始理论，而不适用于莱布尼兹-沃尔夫派的学校哲学。本文通过证明这些康德式的反对意见在何种程度上不适用于莱布尼兹本人，并争论康德对某些以莱布尼兹形而上学表示的中央莱布尼兹学说的理解，为检验这种非正统的阅读提供了必要的基础。先验的唯心主义的先驱确实是有道理的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jauernig, Anja.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 442 p.
  • 总页数 442
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号