• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Comparison of the Partner Institutions' Perceptions of the Cross-border Higher Education Program and the Impact on Program Implementation: Case Studies of Two Sino-U.S. Business Management Programs.
【24h】

Comparison of the Partner Institutions' Perceptions of the Cross-border Higher Education Program and the Impact on Program Implementation: Case Studies of Two Sino-U.S. Business Management Programs.

机译：合作伙伴机构对跨境高等教育计划的理解及其对计划实施的影响的比较：两个中美企业管理计划的案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study examined discrepancies and similarities between the partner institutions' perceptions of the motivations, expected outcomes, and desired strategies achieving such outcomes in their cross-border higher educational programs from a game theory perspective, in the context of Mainland China (hereafter referred to as China). By comparing the key stakeholders' perceptions from the partner institutions, this study identified compatibility and potential conflicts between the partner institutions involved in cross-border higher educational programs and to analyze these discrepancies and similarities in relation to program implementation strategies to identify potential impact they could have on the program implementation. Two Sino-U.S. business management programs were used as cases to answer the set of research questions that are informed by game theory. A conceptual framework that is grounded in international education, strategic management, and game theory, was devised to capture the dynamic phenomena in cross-border education.;This study found that regardless of the institutions' home country (China or the United States) and their institutional type, similar types of motivations and expected outcomes were identified across all four participating institutions (those with official accreditation). These motivations and expected outcomes included 1) brand recognition and academic reputation, 2) strategic positioning, 3) capacity development and learning, and 4) revenue generation. However, institutions appeared to have different interpretations of these openly stated motivations and expected outcomes, based on their own institutional contexts. The findings suggested that within each partner institution, faculty and administrations (including leaders) sometimes placed a different level of emphasis on expected outcomes, even though key stakeholder groups shared a common understanding around the institutional motivations and expected outcomes mostly as a baseline outcome. The key participants from both partner institutions tended to apply their own interpretation references to their partners, which led to misperceptions between the partners.;Moreover, findings from this study suggest that the strong compatibility between the partners' motivations, expected outcomes, and the preferences of various outcomes made the joint-venture model most appealing to both the Chinese and the U.S. institutions. This compatibility mostly focused on the outcomes of brand recognition, academic reputation, strategic positioning, and financial sustainability of the collaborative programs. Potential conflicts existed between the partners' preferences around these outcomes in the long run, especially between brand promotion and revenue generation. As the collaborative programs continued to evolve and possible external environmental changes occurred, so did the partners' expected outcomes and the related preferences. As a result, the partners tried to make changes and/or added new components to the original chosen strategy. Therefore, although the collaborative programs had been successfully established with the chosen desired strategies, there were potential conflicting discrepancies between the partners' expected outcomes and preferences for various aspects of the desired strategies at a later stage.
机译：这项研究在中国大陆的背景下，从博弈论的角度考察了合作伙伴机构对跨境高等教育课程的动机，预期结果和实现这些成果的预期策略之间的差异和相似性。中国）。通过比较主要利益相关者对合作伙伴机构的看法，本研究确定了参与跨境高等教育计划的合作伙伴机构之间的兼容性和潜在冲突，并分析了与计划实施策略相关的这些差异和相似之处，以确定它们可能产生的影响在程序上有执行。以两个中美企业管理计划为例，以博弈论为基础回答一系列研究问题。设计了一个以国际教育，战略管理和博弈论为基础的概念框架，以捕捉跨境教育中的动态现象。该研究发现，无论机构的祖国（中国或美国）和在所有四个参与机构（获得官方认可的机构）中确定了它们的机构类型，类似动机和预期成果。这些动机和预期成果包括：1）品牌认可度和学术声誉，2）战略定位，3）能力发展和学习以及4）创收。但是，制度似乎根据其自身的制度环境对这些公开陈述的动机和预期结果有不同的解释。调查结果表明，在每个合作伙伴机构中，尽管主要利益相关者团体对机构动机和预期成果的共识大多是作为基线成果，但有时教师和行政部门（包括领导者）对预期成果的重视程度有所不同。两个合作伙伴机构的主要参与者都倾向于将自己的解释参考应用于他们的合作伙伴，这导致了合作伙伴之间的误解。此外，本研究的结果表明，合作伙伴的动机，预期结果和偏好之间的强兼容性。各种成果使合资模式对中美机构都最有吸引力。这种兼容性主要集中在合作计划的品牌认可，学术声誉，战略定位和财务可持续性方面。从长远来看，合作伙伴在围绕这​​些结果的偏好之间存在潜在的冲突，尤其是在品牌推广和创收之间。随着协作计划的不断发展和可能发生的外部环境变化，合作伙伴的预期成果和相关偏好也随之变化。结果，合作伙伴试图对原始选择的策略进行更改和/或添加新的组件。因此，尽管已经成功地使用选定的预期策略建立了合作计划，但是合作伙伴的预期结果与在稍后阶段对预期策略各个方面的偏好之间存在潜在的冲突差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jie, Yiyun.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Education Policy.;Education Higher.;Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 301 p.
  • 总页数 301
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号