• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A disputed name: Is there a solution to the name issue between Macedonia and Greece?
【24h】

A disputed name: Is there a solution to the name issue between Macedonia and Greece?

机译：有争议的名称：马其顿和希腊之间的名称问题是否解决？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The name dispute between Macedonia and Greece emerged in 1991, immediately after the dissolution of the former Yugoslavia, when Macedonia declared its independence. Since then, Macedonia and Greece negotiate under the auspices of the United Nations mediation trying to achieve a "mutually acceptable solution." The resolution of the issue is highly uncertain and questionable.;The name issue is a unique problem in the history of international relations. This issue concerns foreign policy, history, ethics, security, and economy. The historic background which goes back more than 2000 years, further contributes to the complexity of the problem.;Usually international disputes occur over more "traditional" conflicts that involve such matters as borders, land, human rights, or religion. In this case one country insists on a change of the name of the other country, which is virtual rather than material demand. While the problem is virtual, the consequences are real. Recent developments, especially after the NATO Summit in Bucharest in April 2008 where Greece blocked Macedonian accession into Alliance, increased negative sentiments threatening to destroy what has been achieved in building good neighborly relations for more than a decade.;The first chapter introduces the problem and explains how it occurred. Chapter two discusses the historic background of the dispute focusing on three periods: ancient history and the period of Philip II and his son Alexander the Great; recent world and regional history; and a discussion of the historic facts of the dispute. The third chapter explores the security aspect of the name issue and its implications on bilateral relations between Macedonia and Greece as well as on the regional stability. Chapter four envisages the possibility for resolution of the dispute and points to the necessity of solution as soon as possible.;The discussed issue is summarized in the Conclusion. The evidences presented in this paper shows the complexity of the problem for which there is not a simple solution and that international mediation in the efforts for resolution of this issue is essential. This chapter also envisages consequences and possible developments related to the name dispute.
机译：马其顿和希腊之间的地名纠纷是在前南斯拉夫解散后立即于1991年提出的，当时马其顿宣布独立。此后，马其顿和希腊在联合国调解的主持下进行谈判，以期寻求“相互接受的解决方案”。这个问题的解决是高度不确定和可疑的。地名问题是国际关系历史上的一个独特问题。这个问题涉及外交政策，历史，道德，安全和经济。距今已有2000多年的历史背景，进一步加剧了问题的复杂性。通常，国际争端发生在涉及边界，土地，人权或宗教等问题的更多“传统”冲突上。在这种情况下，一个国家坚持要求更改另一个国家的名称，这是虚拟的而不是物质的需求。虽然问题是虚拟的，但后果是真实的。最近的事态发展，特别是在2008年4月于布加勒斯特举行的北约峰会之后，希腊阻止马其顿加入联盟，加剧了消极情绪，有可能破坏建立十多年的睦邻关系所取得的成就。解释了它是如何发生的。第二章以三个时期为中心，探讨了纠纷的历史背景：古代史以及腓力二世和他的儿子亚历山大大帝时期。最近的世界和区域历史；并讨论了争端的历史事实。第三章探讨了名称问题的安全性及其对马其顿和希腊之间的双边关系以及区域稳定的影响。第四章设想了解决争端的可能性，并指出了尽快解决的必要性。总结中总结了所讨论的问题。本文提供的证据表明，该问题的复杂性尚无一个简单的解决方案，在解决这一问题的努力中进行国际调解至关重要。本章还设想了与名称争议有关的后果和可能的发展。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pop-Angelov, Marijan.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgetown University.;

  • 授予单位 Georgetown University.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Relations.
  • 学位 M.A.L.S.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 116 p.
  • 总页数 116
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号