• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Substance and Skepticism in Hume's 'Treatise'.
【24h】

Substance and Skepticism in Hume's 'Treatise'.

机译：休ume的《悲剧》中的实质和怀疑主义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

1.4.5 of Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature provides several reasons for close, sustained reading and general concern for interpreters of Hume. First, the question of the metaphysics of substance is a major issue for early modern philosophers. Second, in this section, Hume makes some of his most careful and dense arguments in the entire Treatise. The neglect of 1.4.5 has kept these arguments from receiving all the consideration that they deserve. Third, there are at least three novel positions that Hume argues for here that he does not argue for elsewhere.;I shall divide my project thematically with respect to Hume's arguments in 1.4.5. Chapter 1 details a series of arguments against the intelligibility of the concept 'substance'. Chapter 2 concerns arguments which attempt to conjoin the material with the immaterial. Chapter 3 focuses on the positions of Spinoza and those of the Theologians as regards substance and the immateriality of the soul. An amendment to the Theologians' arguments examines the advantage of substituting the concept of 'action' for the concept of 'modification' in arguments for the existence of substance. Hume rejects both Spinoza's position and that of the Theologians, as well as their proposed amendment. Chapter 4 is directed at arguments against the possibility of matter causing mind and Hume's defense of the contrary. Finally, Chapter 5 turns briefly to the implications of 1.4.5 for 1.4.6, Of personal identity.
机译：1.4.5休ume的《人性论》为休ume的译员提供了密切，持续阅读和普遍关注的几个原因。首先，物质的形而上学问题是早期现代哲学家的主要问题。其次，在本节中，休ume在整篇论文中提出了一些他最谨慎和最密集的论点。对1.4.5的忽略使这些论点无法获得应有的所有考虑。第三，休ume在这里主张至少三个新颖的立场，而休ume在其他地方没有主张。我将在1.4.5中根据休ume的论点在主题上划分我的项目。第1章详细阐述了一系列反对“物质”概念可理解性的论点。第2章讨论了试图使物质与非物质结合的论点。第三章着重于斯宾诺莎和神学家关于灵魂的实质和非物质性的立场。神学家论点的修正案检验了在实质存在论据中用“行动”概念代替“修饰”概念的优势。休ume既拒绝了斯宾诺莎的立场，也拒绝了神学家的立场，以及他们提出的修正案。第四章讨论了反对物质引起思想和休ume辩护的可能性的论点。最后，第5章简要介绍1.4.5对1.4.6个人身份的含义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cox, Nathan Robert.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 135 p.
  • 总页数 135
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号