• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >How much does governance really matter? The effects of governance on well-being.
【24h】

How much does governance really matter? The effects of governance on well-being.

机译：治理到底有多重要？治理对幸福感的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Looking for the impact of governance on well-being, I estimated the relationship of the Governance Indicators constructed by Kaufmann, Kraay and Zoido-Lobaton in 1999 and three well-being outcomes i.e. GDP per capita, infant mortality and years of schooling, in order to find to what extent better governance is related to better levels of well-being. Holding infrastructure and trade openness constant, several Panel Data regressions were used to observe this relationship across four time average periods. The role of infrastructure in this model is outstanding. Holding everything else constant, if infrastructure increases by 1%, GDP per capita is predicted to increase by 11%, infant mortality is predicted to decrease by 9% and the population over 25 years old without schooling is predicted to decrease by 18%. Whereas 1% increase on trade is predicted to decrease infant mortality by 15%, it is not significant to GDP per capita and years of schooling. I found that the impact of several Governance Indicators on GDP per capita turns out to be substantial. One standard deviation increase in any of the Governance Indicators increases GDP per capita between 5 to 16%. However, the effects of governance on infant mortality and schooling are less clear. The only significant results are associated with the only two indicators related with the distributional role of the government i.e. Government Effectiveness and Regulatory Quality. Holding everything else constant one standard deviation increase in the measure of the effectiveness of government produces a 25 percentage points decrease on the population over 25 years old without schooling, whereas one standard deviation increase in the quality of the country's regulation means a 8.2% reduction on the country's infant mortality rate. It also appears to indicate that GDP growth or average GDP just tell us one part of the story in terms of well-being. The responsibility of the government turns out to be significant in order to ensure not only economic growth but also using this wealth to improve country's human capital expanding opportunities for all the population. Finally, despite the fact that I am not accounting for public spending, it appears to play a central role in these relationships and it seems worthy for further researches.
机译：在寻找治理对幸福感的影响时，我估计了考夫曼，克拉伊和佐伊多-洛巴顿在1999年制定的治理指标与三个幸福感之间的关系，即人均GDP，婴儿死亡率和受教育年限找出更好的治理与更好的福祉水平有多大关系。在保持基础设施和贸易开放度不变的情况下，使用多个Panel Data回归来观察四个时间平均周期之间的这种关系。基础架构在此模型中的作用非常出色。保持其他一切不变，如果基础设施增加1％，人均GDP预计将增长11％，婴儿死亡率预计将下降9％，并且25岁以上未受教育的人口预计将下降18％。预计贸易增长1％可使婴儿死亡率降低15％，但这对人均GDP和受教育年限并不重要。我发现，一些治理指标对人均GDP的影响很大。任何治理指标的标准差增加都会使人均GDP增长5％至16％。但是，治理对婴儿死亡率和教育程度的影响尚不清楚。唯一重要的结果与与政府的分配角色有关的仅有的两个指标相关，即政府效力和监管质量。保持其他所有条件不变，衡量政府效力的标准偏差增加会使25岁以上未受教育的人口减少25个百分点，而国家法规质量的标准偏差增加意味着对25岁以上人口的教育水平下降8.2％。该国的婴儿死亡率。这似乎也表明，GDP的增长或平均GDP只是告诉我们有关福祉的故事的一部分。事实证明，政府的责任重大，不仅要确保经济增长，而且要利用这些财富来改善国家的人力资本，为所有人口增加机会。最后，尽管我没有考虑公共支出，但它似乎在这些关系中起着核心作用，似乎值得进一步研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Arcos Axt, Ivan A.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgetown University.;

  • 授予单位 Georgetown University.;
  • 学科 Sociology Public and Social Welfare.
  • 学位 M.P.P.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 43 p.
  • 总页数 43
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号