• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Wilderness or working forest? British Columbia forest policy debate in the 'Vancouver Sun', 1991--2003.
【24h】

Wilderness or working forest? British Columbia forest policy debate in the 'Vancouver Sun', 1991--2003.

机译：荒野还是正在工作的森林？ 1991--2003年在“温哥华太阳报”中进行的不列颠哥伦比亚省森林政策辩论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this thesis, I use discourse analysis as a tool for examining four distinct environmental policy debates, as they have been represented in the Vancouver Sun. I examine the Protected Areas Strategy and the Forest Practices Code, which were introduced by the New Democratic Party government (1991--2001). I also examine the Working Forest and the Results-based Forest Practices Code, which were introduced by the Liberal government (2001--present). Drawing on Gramscian and Foucauldian theory, I argue that the network of power/knowledge constructed by the Vancouver Sun limits debate over environmental policy to the hegemonic alternatives of "ecomanagerialism" and "eco-capitalism." This network of power/knowledge is constructed from three major organizational standpoints: government, industry and environmentalists. The voices of First Nations and labour are marginalized from the media construction of reality, as are environmental discourses that present a radical alternative to the ecological and social justice impacts of the "treadmill of production."
机译：在本文中，我使用话语分析作为研究四个不同的环境政策辩论的工具，这些辩论已在《温哥华太阳报》上发表过。我研究了新民主党政府（1991--2001）引入的《保护区战略》和《森林实践法》。我还研究了自由政府（2001年至今）引入的《工作森林》和《基于结果的森林实践守则》。我基于格拉姆斯和福柯理论，认为由温哥华太阳报建立的权力/知识网络将关于环境政策的辩论限制在“生态主义”和“生态资本主义”的霸权替代方案上。这种权力/知识网络是从三个主要组织角度构建的：政府，行业和环保主义者。第一民族和劳工的声音在现实的媒体建构中被边缘化，环境话语也被根本地替代了“生产跑步机”对生态和社会正义的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号