首页> 外文学位 >Effects of ethnically diverse photographic stimuli upon preference and discourse tasks completed by African American and Caucasian American adults.

【24h】

Effects of ethnically diverse photographic stimuli upon preference and discourse tasks completed by African American and Caucasian American adults.

机译：种族多样化的摄影刺激对非洲裔美国人和高加索成年人完成的偏好和话语任务的影响。

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This study examined the impact upon a preference sorting task and discourse as determined by number of content units, content units + elaborations and word count when two groups of adults, one African American and one Caucasian American, were presented with six pairs of scenes identical except for the ethnicity of the models in the scenes. For preference, each ethnic group showed significant preferences for their own ethnicity. For the discourse tasks, there were no differences for the number of content units or content units + elaborations between scenes or the ethnicity of the pairs of scenes analyzed. For word count, there was a notable difference between scenes. The participant groups showed minimal differences when presented with the Caucasian scenes. However, when presented with African American Scenes, the Caucasian group provided significantly more words than the African American group. Recommendations determined by the results of this study were that the two participant groups be more rigorously identified to be homogeneous and that more participants be recruited to provide greater statistical power. It was also recommended that the composition of the scenes be evaluated for appropriateness by both Caucasian and African American groups.

机译：这项研究考察了当两组成年人（一名非裔美国人和一名白人）呈现六对相同的场景时，由内容单位，内容单位+细化和字数确定的对偏好排序任务和话语的影响针对场景中模特的种族。为了优先考虑，每个种族都对自己的种族表现出明显的偏好。对于话语任务，场景之间的内容单元或内容单元的数量+精加工或所分析的场景对的种族之间没有差异。对于字数统计，场景之间存在显着差异。与白种人的场景一起呈现时，参加者组的差异很小。但是，当与非裔美国人场景一起呈现时，高加索人组提供的单词远多于非裔美国人组。这项研究结果确定的建议是，应更严格地确定两个参与者组是同质的，并且应招募更多的参与者以提供更大的统计能力。还建议由白种人和非裔美国人团体评估场景的构成是否适当。

著录项

作者
Camp, Travis J.;
展开▼
作者单位

University of South Alabama.;

展开▼
授予单位 University of South Alabama.;
学科 African American Studies.;Health Sciences Speech Pathology.;Black Studies.
学位 M.S.
年度 2010
页码 57 p.
总页数 57
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类药物化学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A confirmatory factor analysis of specific phobia domains in African American and Caucasian American young adults. [J] . Chapman LK, Kertz SJ, Zurlage MM, Journal of anxiety disorders . 2008,第5期

机译：对非裔美国人和高加索裔美国人的特定恐惧症结构域的验证性因素分析。
2. Genome-wide linkage scans for type 2 diabetes mellitus in four ethnically diverse populations-significant evidence for linkage on chromosome 4q in African Americans: the Family Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes Research Group. [J] . Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews . 2009,第8期

机译：在四个种族不同的人群中对2型糖尿病进行全基因组连锁扫描-非洲裔美国人4q染色体上连锁的重要证据：肾病和糖尿病家庭调查研究组。
3. Health disparity (HD) issues that affect underserved and racially or ethnically diverse communities, including African American, underserved and Samoan communities. [J] . Bacquet C, Braithwaite RL Journal of health care for the poor and underserved . 2009,第2Suppla期

机译：卫生差异（高清）影响欠缺和种族或种族各种社区的问题，包括非洲裔美国人，服务不足和萨摩亚社区。
4. Differential Expression of Non-Coding RNAs in African-Americans Versus Caucasians: Implications for the Development of Barrett's Esophagus [C] . Jasmin Nwachokor, Xiaoman Hong, Sharad Mathur, International Molecular Medicine Tri-Conference. . 2015

机译：非编码RNA在非洲裔美国人与高加索人的差异表达：对Barrett食道发展的影响
5. Determination of preference, word count and content units for two types of photographic stimuli presented to African American adults. [D] . McElroy, Janneke N. 2011

机译：确定呈现给非洲裔美国成年人的两种类型的摄影刺激的偏好，字数和内容单位。
6. Differences in Iris Thickness Among African Americans Caucasian Americans Hispanic Americans Chinese Americans and Filipino-Americans [O] . Roland Y Lee, Guofu Huang, Travis C Porco, -1

机译：非洲裔美国人高加索人西班牙裔美国人华裔美国人和菲律宾裔美国人的虹膜厚度差异
7. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices—Summary Article A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines) 11This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees in September 2002, the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in August 2002, and the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology in August 2002.22The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur. The conflict of interest information for the writing committee members is posted on the ACC, AHA, and NASPE Web sites with the full-length version of the update.33When citing this document, the ACC, the AHA, and NASPE would appreciate the following citation format: Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, Freedman RA, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Kerber RE, Naccarelli GV, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Winters SL. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices—Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol2002;40:1703–19.44Copies: This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the ACC (www.acc.org) and the AHA (www.americanheart.org). A single copy of the complete guidelines is available by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Resource Center, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699 (ask for No. 71-0237). To obtain a copy of the Summary Article, ask for reprint No. 71-0236. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 410-528-4426, fax 410-528-4264, or e-mail kbradle@lww.com.55(J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1703–19.)66©2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Gregoratos Gabriel, Abrams Jonathan, Epstein Andrew E, 2002

机译：ACC / AHA / NASPE 2002心脏起搏器和抗心律失常装置植入指南更新-总结文章美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（ACC / AHA / NASPE委员会将更新1998年起搏器指南） 11该文件于2002年9月获得美国心脏病学会基金会董事会的批准，于2002年8月获得美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会的批准，并于2002年8月获得北美起搏和电生理学会的批准。22ACC / AHA工作组《实践指南》将尽一切努力避免由于写作小组成员的外部关系或个人利益而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。具体来说，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组审核，在第一次会议上口头报告给写作小组的所有成员，并在发生变化时进行更新。撰写委员会成员的利益冲突信息已发布在更新的完整版本的ACC，AHA和NASPE网站上。33当引用本文档时，ACC，AHA和NASPE将不胜感激。格式：Gregoratos G，Abrams J，Epstein AE，Freedman RA，Hayes DL，Hlatky MA，Kerber RE，Naccarelli GV，Schoenfeld MH，Silka MJ，Winters SL。 ACC / AHA / NASPE 2002心脏起搏器和抗心律失常装置植入指南更新-总结文章：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（ACC / AHA / NASPE委员会更新了1998年起搏器指南）。 J Am Coll Cardiol2002； 40：1703–19.44复制：此文档可在ACC（www.acc.org）和AHA（www.americanheart.org）的万维网站点上找到。您可以致电800-253-4636（仅限美国）或写信给美国心脏病学会资源中心，地址为9111 Old Georgetown Road，Bethesda，MD 20814-1699，获得一份完整的指南（请致电71-0237））。要获得摘要文章的副本，请索要第71-0236号转载。要购买其他重印本（指定版本和重印本号码）：最多999份，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671；否则，请重新发送。 1000份或更多，请致电410-528-4426，传真410-528-4264或发送电子邮件至kbradle@lww.com.55（J Am Coll Cardiol 2002； 40：1703–19。）66©2002美国心脏病学基金会基金会和美国心脏协会有限公司

Effects of ethnically diverse photographic stimuli upon preference and discourse tasks completed by African American and Caucasian American adults.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅