• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A theoretical approach to legitimizing collaboratively constructed knowledge: A content analysis of Wikipedia science articles based on accidental collaboration.
【24h】

A theoretical approach to legitimizing collaboratively constructed knowledge: A content analysis of Wikipedia science articles based on accidental collaboration.

机译：使协作构造的知识合法化的理论方法：基于偶然协作的Wikipedia科学文章的内容分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study involved an analysis of 147 Wikipedia science articles using content and social network analysis to explore authorial relationships between articles and test a theoretical approach to using accidental collaboration as a tool to legitimize collaboratively constructed knowledge. Contrary to Wikipedia's tagline of "anyone can edit," this study found that articles had a small number of prolific contributors and that these contributors had educational background and edit history suggesting they were knowledgeable about the topics to which they contributed. Results also showed that articles found via accidental collaboration tended to be scientific in nature and often had direct subject matter relationships to their corresponding seed article. Taken together, these results suggest that Wikipedia science articles are at least partially written by knowledgeable individuals. Implications include rethinking how Wikipedia is used by teachers and students; its potential as a tool for developing critical literacy and 21st century skills; and the need for continued research to further explore the issues of legitimacy and reliability of Wikipedia in various subject areas. Due to the limitations of this study, generalizations beyond the science articles studied cannot be made.
机译：这项研究包括使用内容和社交网络分析对147条维基百科科学文章进行的分析，以探索文章之间的作者关系，并测试使用意外协作作为使协作构建的知识合法化的工具的理论方法。与Wikipedia的标语“任何人都可以编辑”相反，该研究发现文章的贡献者数量很少，并且这些贡献者的教育背景和编辑历史表明他们对所贡献的主题很了解。结果还表明，通过偶然协作发现的文章在本质上往往是科学的，并且通常与它们相应的种子文章具有直接的主题关系。综上所述，这些结果表明，维基百科的科学文章至少部分是由知识渊博的个人撰写的。含义包括重新考虑教师和学生如何使用维基百科；其作为发展批判性扫盲和21世纪技能的工具的潜力；以及需要进行持续研究以进一步探讨各个主题领域中Wikipedia的合法性和可靠性问题。由于这项研究的局限性，无法对所研究的科学论文进行概括。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hutchinson, James Patrick.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Northern Colorado.;

  • 授予单位 University of Northern Colorado.;
  • 学科 Education Technology of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 206 p.
  • 总页数 206
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号