• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Wittenberg historiography: Philipp Melanchthon and the reformation of historical thought.
【24h】

Wittenberg historiography: Philipp Melanchthon and the reformation of historical thought.

机译：威滕伯格史学：Philipp Melanchthon与历史思想的改革。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

During the sixteenth century, the scholars of Reformation Wittenberg forged a new interpretation of the past as a historical foundation for their efforts to reorder the European world. The Wittenberg historians were deeply indebted to earlier traditions of historical thought, but they were also innovators who created patterns of interpretation that have persisted to the present. The dissertation examines the development of this distinctly Wittenberg view of history by concentrating on Philipp Melanchthon (1497--1560) and his universal history, Carion's Chronicle, first published in 1532.;With Carion's Chronicle, Melanchthon overturned centuries of historiography that had supported papal claims to political supremacy. In its place, he developed a new perspective that stressed the importance of the Imperial constitution for preserving peace in Europe, and he tacitly argued for the historical legitimacy of the Wittenberg Reformation. In doing so, Melanchthon intervened transformatively in the development of historical method by dismissing the Six Ages of St. Augustine, which had been used by scholars such as Werner Rolevinck in his Fasciculus Temporum and Hartmann Schedel in the Nuremberg Chronicle. Instead, Melanchthon turned to the Four Monarchies of the prophet Daniel, which he interpreted as culminating in the Holy Roman Empire rather than the Turks, and he argued that the Empire's political form (elective monarchy) had enabled it to survive centuries of hostile meddling by the French and papacy. Later political theorists, such as Jean Bodin and Hermann Conring, challenged Melanchthon's perspective, but his views nevertheless remained influential within German intellectual circles for centuries.;The dissertation includes appendices with the first complete census of the extant editions of Carion's Chronicle and an analysis of the textual history. Melanchthon and later his son-in-law, Caspar Peucer, strenuously resisted historiographical practices, such as continuation and adaptation, that had been common in the Middle Ages and the early decades of printing. In this respect, their engagement with the Chronicle offers a unique window into sixteenth century views of authorship and intellectual property, as well as historiographical methods.
机译：在16世纪，维滕贝格（Wittenberg）改革学者对过去进行了新的诠释，以此作为他们为重塑欧洲世界而努力的历史基础。威登堡历史学家深深地怀念历史思想的早期传统，但他们还是创造了一直延续至今的解释模式的创新者。论文通过集中精力研究菲利普·梅兰奇顿（Philipp Melanchthon，1497--1560）和他的普遍历史《凯里恩纪事》（Carion's Chronicle，1532年首次出版），考察了维滕贝格这种独特的历史观的发展; Melanchthon在《卡里恩纪事》中推翻了支持教皇的几个历史学声称拥有政治至上。取而代之的是，他提出了新的观点，强调了帝国宪法对于维护欧洲和平的重要性，并且他默认维滕贝格改革的历史合法性。这样做时，Melanchthon摒弃了圣奥古斯丁的六个时代，从而变革性地介入了历史方法的发展，这已被Werner Rolevinck的《 Fasciculus Temporum》和Hartmann Schedel等在纽伦堡纪事中的学者所采用。相反，Melanchthon转向了先知但以理的四个君主制，他将其解释为最终是神圣罗马帝国而不是土耳其人，并且他辩称，帝国的政治形式（选举君主制）使其能够幸存了数百年的敌对干预。法国和罗马教皇。后来的政治理论家，例如让·博丁（Jean Bodin）和赫尔曼·康林（Hermann Conring），对梅兰奇顿的观点提出了挑战，但他的观点在几个世纪以来仍然在德国知识界内具有影响力。论文包括附录，对现存版本的《 Carion's Chronicle》进行了首次完整的人口普查，并分析了文字历史。 Melanchthon及其后来的女son Caspar Peucer坚决抵制在中世纪和印刷初期几十年来很普遍的史学实践，例如延续和改编。在这方面，他们与《纪事》的参与提供了一个独特的窗口，可以深入了解16世纪的著作权和知识产权以及史学方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lotito, Mark Andrew.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 History European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 553 p.
  • 总页数 553
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号