• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Paths of legitimacy: A sociology of the First Amendment examining legal change at the boundary between state and society.
【24h】

Paths of legitimacy: A sociology of the First Amendment examining legal change at the boundary between state and society.

机译：合法性的道路：第一修正案的社会学，考察了国家与社会之间边界上的法律变化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

What political influences shape the outcomes of First Amendment lawsuits? What are the juridical effects of civil liberties litigation? What institutional forces shape individual rights of expression and dignity---and collective rights to challenge political authority? Contributing to the law and society tradition, and taking a Durkheimian perspective, informed by critical theory and Bourdieu, this study assesses the judicial management of liberty. The analysis develops a sociology of the First Amendment, tracing the political influences and institutional logics that shape judicial decisions and, conversely, the influence of First Amendment law on institutional logics and behavior in other spheres. The term paths of legitimacy is used to designate institutional associations in the public sphere by which disputes are resolved into rules of law by court and rules of law are converted into norms of practice. The project is organized by three liberties of the First Amendment---religion, speech, and assembly---and a range of case-based methods: discursive explanation; neoinstitutionalism and field theory; and legal geography. In the first two parts of the study, it is shown that the juridical field is sometimes influenced by political codes, such as civil religion, a form of nationalism that governs the display of religious symbols in public; and, conversely, that legal categories influence the realm of civil liberties, for instance, media ethics, an area considered beyond regulation. In the third part, on the freedom of assembly and protest policing, competing hypotheses of the "negotiated management" of demonstrations and the political regulation of territory are examined. It is found that certain regulations of assembly are better explained by the global city thesis, urban differentiation, and political economy of place, than by negotiated management or state-offered legitimations---security needs after 9/11 and riot prevention. As the police turn toward zero tolerance, so do the courts in regulating the "time, place, and manner" of protest. Data examined are judicial opinions, institutional histories, and legitimation claims regarding the regulation of liberty, including the use of mass arrests and free speech zones during the presidential national conventions. Future avenues include examining paths of legitimacy in other areas of law.
机译：哪些政治影响力影响第一修正案诉讼的结果？公民自由诉讼的法律效力是什么？什么样的制度力量塑造个人的表达权和尊严权，以及挑战政治权威的集体权利？这项研究是对法律和社会传统的贡献，并以涂尔干主义的观点为基础，在批判理论和布迪厄的指导下，对自由的司法管理进行了评估。该分析发展了《第一修正案》的社会学，追踪了塑造司法裁决的政治影响和制度逻辑，反之则追溯了《第一修正案》对其他领域的制度逻辑和行为的影响。合法性路径一词用于指代公共领域的机构协会，通过这些协会，争端由法院解决为法律规则，而法律规则则转换为实践规范。该项目由《第一修正案》的三项自由-宗教，言论和集会-以及一系列基于案例的方法组成：新制度主义和领域理论；和法律地理。在研究的前两个部分中，表明了司法领域有时受到政治法规的影响，例如公民宗教，这是一种在公共场合控制宗教符号展示的民族主义形式。相反，法律类别会影响公民自由领域，例如媒体伦理，这是一个不受监管的领域。在第三部分中，关于集会和抗议活动的自由，研究了对示威“谈判管理”和领土政治管制的相互竞争的假设。我们发现，某些集会法规可以通过全球城市论点，城市差异化和地方政治经济学来更好地解释，而不是通过协商管理或政府提供的合法化方法更好地解释-9/11之后的安全需求和防暴。随着警察转向零容忍，法院也在规范抗议的“时间，地点和方式”。所检查的数据是有关自由管制的司法意见，机构历史和合法性主张，包括在总统代表大会期间使用大规模逮捕和言论自由区。未来的途径包括研究其他法律领域的合法性途径。

著录项

  • 作者

    Martinez, Elizabeth E.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Notre Dame.;

  • 授予单位 University of Notre Dame.;
  • 学科 History United States.;Sociology Social Structure and Development.;Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 403 p.
  • 总页数 403
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号