首页> 外文学位 >Shear and tension capacity of arc-spot weld connections for multi-overlap roof deck panels.
【24h】

Shear and tension capacity of arc-spot weld connections for multi-overlap roof deck panels.

机译:多重叠屋顶面板的弧点焊接连接的抗剪和抗拉能力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research project was undertaken to investigate the shear and tensile capacity of arc-spot welds connecting overlapped deck sheets to underlying steel framework. Such connection configurations typically occur in roof deck constructions when steel sheets are stacked at a sidelap or endlap or at both. At these specific locations, the limits on the thickness of the thinnest connected part and on the ratio of supporting steel to sheet steel thickness imposed by the CSA S136 Specification (2007) can be exceeded if thick steel sheets are used. The first step of the project was to determine a welding procedure that would maximize the quality of arc-spot welds when fabricated through thick sheets. It was found that the most important factors to control during the welding of thick steel sheets were the current setting (high intensity), the electrode type (E6011) and the welding technique. During this study welds were fabricated by a certified welder through 1, 2 and 4 layers of steel sheets with thicknesses ranging from 22 gauge (0.76 mm) to 16 gauge (1.52 mm) and a welding procedure was developed for each case. Different sheet steel configurations were used to reproduce the typical loading conditions found in roof deck construction. A minimum of 3 tests were completed for each configuration with each steel sheet thickness. Monotonic tensile resistance tests were carried out on 72 specimens. A total of 107 shear resistance tests were also completed. Of this total, 76 specimens were loaded with a monotonically increasing load while 31 specimens were loaded with a reversed cyclic protocol used to gain insight on the behaviour of arc-spot welds subject to dynamic loading, such as that imposed under seismic ground motions. The resistance, deformation and failure mode was recorded for each specimen. Moreover, the effective weld diameter was recorded for specimens that failed due to weld failure. The results obtained during this study were compared with the current provisions of the CSA S136 Specification to verify if these provisions are applicable to multi-overlap configurations.;During the tensile resistance tests, specimens where the sheet tearing failure mode governed presented an average measured tensile resistance higher than the average resistance predicted by the section E2.2.2 of the CSA S136 Specification . These results showed that the 30% reduction in capacity specified in CSA S136 for specimens fabricated through more than one layer of sheet steel should not apply to specimens governed by the sheet tearing failure mode (Equation E2.2.2-2). However, for specimens that failed due to tensile weld fracture, the average measured resistance was lower than the values predicted by CSA S136, which indicates that the 30% reduction in strength should apply to this case. The 30% strength reduction related to weld failure should also be applied to welds fabricated in standard 1-layer configurations as there is no evidence to suggest that the resistance of arc-spot welds in tension is influenced by the lapped configuration.;The effective weld diameter was recorded for all specimens where weld failure was observed. The average effective weld diameter recorded was larger than the effective weld diameter predicted by CSA S136 Specification . This difference between the measured and predicted values increased as the sheet steel thickness increased. These results demonstrated that a lower limit should be imposed on Equation E2.2.1-5 of CSA S136 to improve its precision when dealing with large thicknesses of sheet steel. In the monotonic shear tests, the average shear resistance recorded was greater than the average resistance predicted by section E2.2.1 of CSA S136. A modification to this section is proposed to improve its overall precision. During the cyclic tests, the results demonstrated that the resistance of the specimens did not decrease after sustaining several loading cycles at load levels smaller than and then equal to the factored resistance. The results from the cyclic tests also showed that ductile failure can occur when the sheet bearing failure mode is engaged. This failure mode was observed for some specimens where the average weld diameter was relatively large when compared to the steel sheet thickness.
机译:进行该研究项目是为了研究将重叠的甲板板连接到底层钢框架的弧点焊的剪切和拉伸能力。当将钢板堆叠在侧板或侧板或两者上时,这种连接构造通常发生在屋顶甲板结构中。在这些特定位置,如果使用厚钢板,则可以超过CSA S136规范(2007)对最薄连接部分的厚度以及支撑钢板与钢板厚度之比的限制。该项目的第一步是确定一种焊接程序,当通过厚板进行制造时,该程序将最大限度地提高电弧点焊的质量。发现在厚钢板焊接过程中要控制的最重要因素是电流设置(高强度),电极类型(E6011)和焊接技术。在此研究中,由合格的焊工通过1、2和4层厚度为22号(0.76毫米)至16号(1.52毫米)的钢板制造焊缝,并针对每种情况制定了焊接程序。使用不同的钢板配置来再现屋顶甲板结构中的典型载荷条件。对于每种厚度的钢板,至少要完成3个测试。在72个样品上进行了单调抗拉试验。还完成了107次抗剪切力测试。在总共76个试样中,单调增加的荷载被加载,而31个试样被反向循环规约加载,该规约用于了解承受动态载荷(例如在地震地震动下施加的载荷)的弧斑焊缝的行为。记录每个样品的电阻,变形和破坏模式。此外,记录了由于焊接失败而失效的试样的有效焊接直径。将本研究中获得的结果与CSA S136规范的现行规定进行比较,以验证这些规定是否适用于多重重叠配置;在抗拉力测试期间,以薄板撕裂破坏模式为主导的试样给出了平均测得的抗拉强度电阻高于CSA S136规范E2.2.2节预测的平均电阻。这些结果表明,通过多于一层钢板制造的试样的CSA S136中规定的容量降低30%不适用于受钢板撕裂破坏模式控制的试样(公式E2.2.2-2)。但是,对于因拉伸焊缝断裂而失效的样品,平均测得的电阻值低于CSA S136预测的值,这表明这种情况下应适用30%的强度降低。与焊接失效有关的30%的强度降低也应应用于标准的1层构造的焊缝,因为没有证据表明电弧点焊的抗拉强度受搭接构造的影响。记录所有观察到焊接失败的样品的直径。记录的平均有效焊接直径大于CSA S136规范预测的有效焊接直径。测量值和预测值之间的差异随钢板厚度的增加而增加。这些结果表明,在处理厚钢板时,应对CSA S136的公式E2.2.1-5施加下限,以提高其精度。在单调剪切试验中,记录的平均剪切阻力大于CSA S136的E2.2.1节所预测的平均阻力。建议对该部分进行修改以提高其整体精度。在循环测试过程中,结果表明,在小于或等于分解系数的负载水平下承受多个负载循环后,样品的电阻并未降低。循环测试的结果还表明,当采用薄板轴承失效模式时,可能会发生延性失效。在某些试样的平均焊缝直径与钢板厚度相比较大的情况下,观察到这种破坏模式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Guenfoud, Nadir.;

  • 作者单位

    Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering Architectural.;Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 M.Sc.A.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 282 p.
  • 总页数 282
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号