首页> 外文学位 >Plantinga's case against naturalism (Alvin Plantinga).
【24h】

Plantinga's case against naturalism (Alvin Plantinga).

机译:普林廷加反对自然主义的案例(阿尔文·普林廷加)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis explicates Alvin Plantinga's “Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism,” which purports to show that the conjunction of metaphysical naturalism with evolutionary theory is self-defeating; and evaluates the argument in light of several scholarly objections that have been raised against it.; Plantinga has already published responses to some of the objections, and these responses are articulated here. However, there are several objections that have not yet been answered in any published work. This thesis provides a detailed response to each of these in a manner that is both original and consistent with Plantinga's most recent formulation of the argument.; The conclusion of this treatment of the argument will demonstrate that the objections have actually served to facilitate a clearer and stronger version of the argument. Through this investigation, we will be able to see the important contribution that the argument makes to the philosophical sub-fields of epistemology, metaphysics, and the philosophy of religion.
机译:本文阐述了阿尔文·普林达加的《反对自然主义的进化论》,该论据表明,形而上学的自然主义与进化论的结合是自败的。并根据针对该论点的一些学术异议来评估该论点。普林丁加已经发布了对某些异议的回应,这些回应在此明确说明。但是,有一些反对意见尚未在任何已发表的著作中得到解答。本论文以一种既原始又与普林丁加最近的论点相一致的方式对上述每一种进行了详细的回应。对论点进行这种处理的结论将表明,反对实际上有助于使论点更清晰,更有力。通过这项调查,我们将能够看到该论点对认识论,形而上学和宗教哲学的哲学子领域做出的重要贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Thune, Michael Gregory.;

  • 作者单位

    California State University, Long Beach.;

  • 授予单位 California State University, Long Beach.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 94 p.
  • 总页数 94
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号