• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Fundamental Rights lost in complexity: The protection of fundamental rights against violations by the rulemaker in converging national and European legal systems.
【24h】

Fundamental Rights lost in complexity: The protection of fundamental rights against violations by the rulemaker in converging national and European legal systems.

机译：基本权利错综复杂：保护基本权利，防止规则制定者在融合国家和欧洲法律体系中侵犯知识产权。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Several courts at the national and European level examine whether the legislator violated the protection of fundamental rights. This is remarkable as most national judicial orders considered judicial review of legislation incompatible with the concept of legislation as the expression of the will of the people. The current situation where several courts in different overlapping legal orders examine legislation on fundamental rights compatibility is the result of several simultaneous but distinct evolutions. Therefore, there is no commonly agreed rule which court will have the last say if the supreme courts of the different legal orders uphold a conflicting interpretation of the same fundamental right.;This Phd analyses how the different supreme courts interact and whether the multiplicity of courts protecting fundamental rights results in a better protection of fundamental rights. The relations between the different courts are categorized in terms of resistance, convergence and engagement. This Phd finds that the supreme courts of the overlapping legal orders act as interconnected actors in a social network. They try at the same time to avoid open conflicts while maintaining their autonomous position. In general, therefore, these courts all prefer a position of engagement balancing restraint towards the jurisprudence of other supreme courts with loyal cooperation in practice.;The multiplicity of supreme courts scrutinizing the compatibility of legislation with fundamental rights holds several challenges, namely the loss of legal certainty, the risk of defenselessness of an individual due to restraint of courts towards each other and the constant possibility of open conflicts. This Phd concludes, however, that complexity of fundamental rights protection is an inevitable outcome of the globalization of human rights protection. This Phd recommends courts to provide for a more transparent and clear justification of the reasons why they comply with the case law of other courts and the limits they place to such convergence. The author finds that the real victim of the complexity of fundamental rights protection in the European legal space is the procedural protection. The author advises to dedicate more efforts and attention to the effectiveness of the procedural side.
机译：国家和欧洲各级法院都在审查立法者是否违反了基本权利的保护。这是惊人的，因为大多数国家司法命令都认为对立法的司法复核与立法概念不符，后者是人民意志的表达。当前情况是，几个法院以不同的重叠法律命令审查有关基本权利兼容性的立法，这是同时发生但又有所不同的演变的结果。因此，如果不同法律命令的最高法院对同一基本权利的解释相互矛盾，则没有哪个法院将拥有最后发言权的共识规则;该博士学位分析了不同的最高法院如何相互作用以及法院是否具有多重性。保护基本权利可以更好地保护基本权利。不同法院之间的关系按抵抗力，趋同性和参与性进行分类。该博士发现，重叠法律命令的最高法院在社交网络中充当相互联系的参与者。他们同时努力避免公开冲突，同时保持自己的自主权。因此，总的来说，这些法院都倾向于在实践中保持忠诚合作，以平衡对其他最高法院的判例的交战立场;最高法院审查立法与基本权利的相容性的多重性面临若干挑战，即丧失法律效力。法律上的确定性，由于法院相互限制而造成的个人无法抗辩的风险以及持续发生公开冲突的可能性。但是，本博士的结论是，基本权利保护的复杂性是人权保护全球化的必然结果。该博士建议法院为它们遵守其他法院判例法的原因以及它们对这种趋同的限制设定更为透明和明确的理由。作者发现，欧洲法律空间中基本权利保护复杂性的真正受害者是程序保护。作者建议将更多的精力和精力投入到程序方面的有效性上。

著录项

  • 作者

    Van de Heyning, Catherine.;

  • 作者单位

    Universiteit Antwerpen (Belgium).;

  • 授予单位 Universiteit Antwerpen (Belgium).;
  • 学科 Law.;International law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 544 p.
  • 总页数 544
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号