• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Killing culture two: Toward an anatomy of cultural transformation in early Soviet Russia, 1920s--1930s.
【24h】

Killing culture two: Toward an anatomy of cultural transformation in early Soviet Russia, 1920s--1930s.

机译：杀死文化的第二点：迈向1920年代至1930年代早期苏联苏维埃文化转型的剖析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Wholesale changes in Soviet Russian culture during the 1920s and 1930s have most commonly been characterized as symptomatic of a social transformation in society caused by a political agent, such as Stalin, or force, such as class struggle. An alternative model for understanding cultural transformation during this period and others in Russian and Soviet history is provided by Vladimir Paperny in Kul'tura dva. Paperny applies semiotic theory and a structure of binary pairings to describe the history of early Soviet culture as the alternation of two opposing systems of meaning, what he calls "Culture One" and "Culture Two.";The present work represents an effort to update Paperny's original thesis by revisiting his theoretical premises from an historical perspective, and supplementing them with findings from contemporary and recent research in the cognitive sciences. The semiotic interpretive model is called into question as an objective metadescription because it derives from the same socio-historical circumstances as the cultural phenomena to which it is applied. Instead, both culture and theory are treated in mutual interaction, and a new thesis is forwarded to account for their relationship. The transformation in early Soviet Culture that Paperny describes in semiotic terms as binary oppositions finds its cause in the chiastic reversal of dominance or "flip" between two complementary and mutually inhibitive patterns of cognition associated in individuals with left hemisphere and right hemisphere brain activity. The analysis focuses on transformative elements used in the culture to trigger a switch in cognitive patterns individually and thereby effect a general transformation in disseminated culture collectively. It contrasts the notions of byt (being, existence) and veshch' (thing), which were perceived by intellectuals as endemic of socio-cultural inertia among the general population, to ostensive representations and demonstrations of killing, which were deployed as an emotional motivating force for change.
机译：在1920年代和1930年代，苏联俄罗斯文化的全面变化最常见的特征是由政治动因（例如斯大林）或武力（例如阶级斗争）引起的社会转型。弗拉基米尔·帕尼（Vladimir Paperny）在库尔图拉（Kul'tura dva）中提供了另一种模式来理解这一时期以及俄罗斯和苏联历史上的文化转型。帕尼用符号学理论和二进制配对的结构将早期苏联文化的历史描述为两个相对的意义体系的交替，他称之为“文化一”和“文化二”。 Paperny的原始论文是从历史角度重新审视其理论前提，并以当代和最近在认知科学领域的研究成果作为补充。符号学解释模型作为一种客观的元描述而受到质疑，因为它源自与应用它的文化现象相同的社会历史环境。取而代之的是，文化和理论都在相互作用中被对待，并且提出了新的论文来说明它们之间的关系。帕尼用符号学的术语描述为二元对立的早期苏联文化的转变，其原因是在左半球和右半球大脑活动的个体相关的两种互补和相互抑制的认知模式之间的主导地位或“翻转”的混乱逆转中找到了原因。分析着重于文化中使用的转化要素，以单独触发认知模式的转换，从而共同影响传播文化中的总体转化。它把知识分子认为是普通民众中社会文化惯性的地方性的“拜特”（“存在”，“存在”）和“瓦什奇”（“物”）的概念与表面上的杀戮表示和论证相提并论。变革的力量。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gilman, Christopher James.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Southern California.;

  • 授予单位 University of Southern California.;
  • 学科 Literature Slavic and East European.;History Russian and Soviet.;Art History.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 396 p.
  • 总页数 396
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号