• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Reader engagement with data journalism: Comparing The Guardian and Washington Post's coverage of people killed by police
【24h】

Reader engagement with data journalism: Comparing The Guardian and Washington Post's coverage of people killed by police

机译：读者对数据新闻的参与：比较《卫报》和《华盛顿邮报》报道的被警察杀害的人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The issue of people killed by police has become a focus of current political and social discourse related to criminal justice reform in the United States. Two data journalism projects attempting to track previously missing data have been central to a changing discussion. The Guardian's The Counted and The Washington Post's Investigation: Police Shootings have each attempted to create a running log of fatalities resulting from law enforcement activities. Such endeavors have added to a collective consciousness about the scope and commonality of deadly police encounters, and has provided empirical reference points for various legislative pushes related to police accountability. These two projects -- one from an acknowledged leader in data journalism, the other by a legacy newspaper with a tradition of Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalism -- presented a unique opportunity to compare and contrast two exemplars of data journalism in an active contemporary media context. This thesis conducted a comparative case study consisting of content analysis built on a framework of Coddington's (2015) typology. Findings showed two different approaches to data journalism, one of which won the Pulitzer Prize. In the end, this thesis offers a proposition of adding a new dimension to Coddington --- vision of self, which would assess different data journalism decisions as a binary choice between seeing journalism as a public service or national news.
机译：被警察杀害的人的问题已成为当前与美国刑事司法改革有关的政治和社会话题的焦点。试图跟踪以前丢失的数据的两个数据新闻项目对不断变化的讨论至关重要。 《卫报》的伯爵和《华盛顿邮报》的调查：警察枪击事件均试图记录执法活动造成的死亡人数连续记录。这种努力使人们更加认识到致命警察遭遇的范围和共同性，并为与警察问责有关的各种立法推动提供了经验参考。这两个项目-一个来自公认的数据新闻领导者，另一个来自具有普利策奖获奖调查新闻传统的传统报纸-提供了一个独特的机会，可以在活跃的当代媒体中比较和对比两个数据新闻范例上下文。本文进行了一个比较案例研究，包括基于Coddington（2015）类型学框架的内容分析。调查结果显示了两种不同的数据新闻方法，其中一种获得了普利策奖。最后，本文提出了一个建议，即在科丁顿的自我视野中增加新的维度，以评估不同的数据新闻决策，这是将新闻视为公共服务还是国家新闻的二元选择。

著录项

  • 作者

    Michalski, Dan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Nevada, Las Vegas.;
  • 学科 Journalism.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 120 p.
  • 总页数 120
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号