• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Standardization of Archival Description in Korea: Examining the Understanding, Adoption, and Implementation of ISAD(G).
【24h】

Standardization of Archival Description in Korea: Examining the Understanding, Adoption, and Implementation of ISAD(G).

机译：韩国档案描述的标准化：审查ISAD（G）的理解，采用和实施。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study attempts to understand the standardization of ISAD(G)---International Standard of Archival Description (General) --- from a cultural as well as technical perspective. While several studies have been conducted on the implementation of the ISAD(G) in Western countries, the Asian national and local experiences of the standard remain relatively unexplored. Using Korea as a case study, this study aims to explore how the international standard (the ISAD(G)) impacts local practice in the non-Western countries, how the Western archival paradigm embedded in the ISAD(G) standard reinforced Western archival practice within non-Western societies, and how non-Western societies re-appropriate the archival practice in the course of adopting the standard. To explore the adoption of the standard, this researcher employs a combination of historical text analysis, a crosswalk analysis of metadata, and ethnographic research analysis.;Until the late 20th century, the idea of having an archival descriptive tool was rarely of primary concern in Korea. This indifference resulted in leaving the systematic development of archival description behind. In this regard, the introduction of ISAD(G) in historical institutions brought an innovative change in attitudes toward archival management. However, the decision to adopt ISAD(G) and the implementation of its principles often encountered problems, because Korean recordkeeping infrastructures are different from those assumed by the standard. Cultural elements (such as history, values, personal identity, education, and an institution's social roles and culture) are deeply associated with decision making in the process of standard adoption. The study found that standard adoption is not a linear and transparent process that progresses unambiguously from the basic principles of archival description to system design. Rather, the direction of the standardization depends more on identities, educations, institutional cultures, and associated communication patterns.
机译：这项研究试图从文化和技术的角度理解ISAD（G）-国际档案描述标准（一般）的标准化。尽管已经对西方国家实施ISAD（G）进行了一些研究，但该标准在亚洲国家和地方的亚洲经验仍然相对较少。这项研究以韩国为例，旨在探讨国际标准（ISAD（G））如何影响非西方国家的本地实践，嵌入ISAD（G）标准的西方档案范式如何增强西方档案实践在非西方社会中，以及非西方社会如何在采用该标准的过程中重新适应档案实践。为了探索该标准的采用，该研究人员结合了历史文本分析，元数据的人行横道分析和人种学研究分析的组合。直到20世纪后期，拥有档案描述工具的想法在美国很少受到关注韩国。这种冷漠导致了档案描述系统的发展。在这方面，在历史机构中引入ISAD（G）带来了对档案管理态度的创新变化。但是，采用ISAD（G）的决定及其原则的实施通常会遇到问题，因为韩国的记录保存基础设施与该标准所假定的基础设施不同。文化要素（例如历史，价值观，个人身份，教育以及机构的社会角色和文化）与标准采用过程中的决策密切相关。该研究发现，标准的采用并不是一个线性且透明的过程，它从档案描述的基本原理到系统设计都明确地发展了。相反，标准化的方向更多地取决于身份，教育，制度文化和相关的沟通方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Youn, Eunha.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Information Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 240 p.
  • 总页数 240
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号