• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Thinking Religion as More than One: A Deconstructive Appeal for Pluralism.
【24h】

Thinking Religion as More than One: A Deconstructive Appeal for Pluralism.

机译：认为宗教不止一个：对多元主义的破坏性呼吁。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation argues that the concept of religion, as it has been understood and employed by the main currents of the philosophy of religion at least since Kant, does not deal adequately with the plurality of concrete religious traditions that exist in the world. In order to move away from the traditional philosophical tendency to think about religion as a unitary object with an identifiable essence, I propose both that we look beyond the discipline of philosophy in order to glean insights from sociology, religious studies, and theology, and that we take up the concern with inescapable difference evident in Jacques Derrida’s work. My aim, simply, is to make a case for greater attention to pluralism in philosophical inquiry into issues concerning the religious.;Part One begins by examining three important historical sources for contemporary philosophical conceptualizations of religion: Kant, Schleiermacher, and Hegel. I then proceed to a critique of the use of the term “religion” based in recent sociological and religious-scientific work. Building primarily on the work of Danièle Hervieu-Léger, I propose that we substitute the provisional category “religious tradition” for the essential concept “religion.” Lastly, I fill out the understanding of “religious tradition” with reference to Heidegger’s use of formal indications and Derrida’s “quasi-transcendentals.”;Part Two contains extended examinations of three quasi-transcendentals that Derrida employs in contexts related to religion: messianicity, auto-immunity, and hospitality. The aim of these chapters is to follow some of the ways in which difference, change, and openness to others are inherent in the structure of what we can identify as religious traditions.;The first chapter of Part Three turns to some examples of recent scholarship on issues of religious, political, and ethnic difference in South Asia, in order both to highlight the fact that these differences can be articulated in a variety of ways and to call attention to resources for understanding and encouraging pluralism beyond Western milieus. The last chapter focuses on examples from theological approaches to pluralism, demonstrating ways in which issues of religious diversity can be approached explicitly from within religious traditions.
机译：这篇论文认为，至少自康德以来，宗教概念就已被宗教哲学的主要潮流所理解和采用，但它并不能充分应对世界上存在的多种具体宗教传统。为了摆脱传统的哲学倾向，即将宗教视为具有可识别本质的统一对象，我建议我们不仅要超越哲学学科，而且还要从社会学，宗教研究和神学中收集见解，并且我们以雅克·德里达（Jacques Derrida）的作品中不可避免的差异来解决这个问题。简而言之，我的目的是要在对宗教问题的哲学研究中更多地关注多元性。第一部分首先探讨了当代宗教哲学概念的三个重要历史渊源：康德，施莱尔马赫和黑格尔。然后，我对最近社会学和宗教科学工作中使用“宗教”一词进行评论。我主要基于DanièleHervieu-Léger的工作，我建议用临时类别“宗教传统”代替基本概念“宗教”。最后，我参考海德格尔对形式指征的使用和德里达的“准先验者”来补充对“宗教传统”的理解。第二部分包含对德里达在与宗教有关的情况下所使用的三种准先验者的扩展考察：弥赛亚，自身免疫和待客之道。这些章节的目的是遵循一些方法，在这些方法中，我们可以确定为宗教传统的结构具有与生俱来的差异，变化和对他人的开放性。第三部分的第一章介绍了一些近期学术研究的例子。在南亚的宗教，政治和种族差异问题上，既要强调可以通过多种方式表达这些差异的事实，又要引起人们对资源的关注，以理解和鼓励西方环境之外的多元化。上一章侧重于从神学方法论到多元论的例子，展示了可以从宗教传统中明确地解决宗教多样性问题的方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Norton, Michael Barnes.;

  • 作者单位

    Villanova University.;

  • 授予单位 Villanova University.;
  • 学科 Religion General.;Philosophy.;Theology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 225 p.
  • 总页数 225
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号