• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Autonomous preferences, autonomous persons: Toward an achievement conception of autonomy and its role in political argument.
【24h】

Autonomous preferences, autonomous persons: Toward an achievement conception of autonomy and its role in political argument.

机译：自治的偏好，自治的人：建立自治的成就概念及其在政治论证中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Though autonomy's role in moral, political, and legal argument has risen to considerable prominence, its nature and value remain obscure and contentious. This project is an attempt to capture what is at the heart of autonomy and to explore some of its overlooked political implications. I argue than an autonomous person is someone who is self-creating, self-determining, and acts on and satisfies his autonomous preferences. Moreover, I argue that the state has a prima facie obligation to help its citizens act on and satisfy their autonomous preferences.; In chapter 1, I attempt to provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the concept of an autonomous preference. I argue that a preference is autonomous if and only if it is endorsed by the agent for the right reasons. In chapter 2, I wrestle with the problem of applying this account to actual preferences and persons. Here I develop further conditions that make it likely or unlikely that a preference satisfies the necessary and sufficient conditions for autonomy developed in chapter 1. In chapter 3, I show how the concept of an autonomous person can be derived from that of an autonomous preference. I argue that an autonomous person is someone who acts on and satisfied a particular subset of his autonomous preferences, namely those that are connected to his conception of worthwhile life.; In chapter 4, I explore the political implications of my account of autonomy. Here I argue that the state has a prima facie obligation, grounded in respect for persons, to help its citizens act on and satisfy their autonomous preferences. In the conclusion I explore several ways in which the state can fulfill this obligation. I defend the view that the state should pursue this by helping persons act on and satisfy their autonomous political preferences, and that this can be done by implementing a more deliberative political system. Finally, in the appendix, I defend my view from a more general objection that the state cannot base its policies on the preferences of its citizens because of technical problems having to do with the aggregation of preferences.
机译：尽管自治在道德，政治和法律论点中的作用已显着提高，但其性质和价值仍然晦涩而有争议。这个项目试图抓住自治的核心，并探索其一些被忽视的政治含义。我认为，一个自治的人是一个能够自我创造，自我决定，并按照自己的喜好行事并满足其喜好的人。此外，我认为，国家负有<斜体>表面义务，以帮助其公民按照自己的喜好采取行动并满足其自主偏好。在第一章中，我试图为自主偏好的概念提供必要和充分的条件。我认为，只有当代理人出于正确的理由认可了偏好时，偏好才是自主的。在第二章中，我将把这个描述应用于实际的偏好和人的问题进行了探讨。在这里，我提出了进一步的条件，使偏好可能或不太可能满足第1章中为自主权所必需的充分条件。在第3章中，我将说明如何从自主偏好的概念中衍生出一个自主人的概念。我认为，一个自主的人是根据自己的特定偏好而行动并满足其特定偏好的人，这些偏好与他的有价值的生活观念有关。在第四章中，我探讨了自治的政治含义。我在这里辩称，国家出于对人的尊重而负有 prima facie 义务，以帮助其公民采取行动并满足其自主偏好。在结论中，我探讨了国家履行这一义务的几种方式。我捍卫这样一种观点，即国家应该通过帮助人们采取行动并满足他们的自主性（政治性）偏好来实现这一目标，并且可以通过实施更具审议性的政治制度来做到这一点。最后，在附录中，我从一个更普遍的反对意见中捍卫了我的观点，即由于技术问题与偏好的集合有关，国家不能将政策基于其公民的偏好。

著录项

  • 作者

    Valdman, Mikhail Joshua.;

  • 作者单位

    Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;

  • 授予单位 Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.; Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 256 p.
  • 总页数 256
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号